|
B2, h1: a risk to the patient's health could not be excluded for these specific circumstances, since pilot holes and screws were placed in the patient's spine in a different path and position than desired with brainlab navigation involved, despite according to the surgeon (treating clinician): the deviation of the spine screws placed with the aid of navigation was detected by the surgeon before finalizing the surgery with an intra-operative ct scan, and the placements where necessary (3) were corrected to their intended positions with navigation at the very same surgery.The final outcome of the surgery was successful as intended, with all placements correct at the end of the surgery.There was no direct (or increased) risk of harm to a critical structure due to the deviating placements.There was no harm nor negative effect to the patient, also not due to the surgery/anesthesia prolongation of ca.20-30min.There were further no remedial actions for the patient done, necessary or planned.Hospitalization was also not prolonged.H6: according to the results of the brainlab investigation and the information provided by the hospital, it can be concluded that the root cause for the deviating spine placements with the aid of navigation, with the spine screws in vertebrae left t3, t9 and t10 deviating shifted by ca.3-4mm medial and decided to re-position at the same surgery, is: movements of the patient anatomy during the surgery, after anatomy location registration to navigation and occurring/existing at the first placement already, due to an insufficiently rigid connection of the anatomy operated on relative to the vertebra the navigation reference array was fixated to (l1).This insufficient anatomy connection, not as required, caused the anatomy to move during the surgery due to forces applied to the bone during instrumentation and/or the breathing pattern of the patient particularly affecting the thoracic region.Navigation and imaging data provided for this surgery show the differences of the anatomy locations in between the pre-placement and the post-placement scans, matching the deviations of the spine placements.Multi-level navigation - i.E.Operating on a different vertebra than the one the navigation reference array is fixated to or operating across multiple vertebrae without remounting the patient reference array and reregistering - especially if the connection in between the vertebrae is not rigid - results in relative movements of the vertebrae (actual anatomy) during the surgery that cannot be compensated by the navigation software displaying instrument positions on the registered pre-placement patient image scan.Apparently, the resulting deviation between the locations of the actual patient anatomy and the registered pre-placement patient image scan displayed by the navigation during the surgery was apparently not recognized by the surgeon with the necessary and appropriate navigation accuracy verification throughout the surgery, for e.G.Whenever significant force has been applied to the bone, before and during performing significant invasive surgical actions.There is no indication of a systematic error or malfunction of the brainlab device (navigation).Corresponding brainlab measures to minimize this anticipated risk as low as reasonably practicable are already in place.H7: brainlab intends to re-iterate the relevant topics regarding the use of the device to this customer.
|
|
An open surgery on the thoracic and lumbar spine, for a fusion of vertebrae t3 to l2 for kyphosis correction, with intended placement of 24 spine screws bilateral for fixation, was performed with the aid of the brainlab spine & trauma navigation 2.0.From an intra-operative ct scan, the surgeons determined that the spine screws placed deviated from their intended positions with a tendency to the patient's right, with 3 screws on the left side - in left t3, t9 and t10 - deviating shifted by ca.3-4mm medial.The surgeons decided that these 3 screws needed re-positioning, removed and re-placed them with navigation to their correct positions at the very same surgery.According to the surgeon (treating clinician): the final outcome of the surgery was successful as intended, with all placements correct at the end of the surgery.There was no direct (or increased) risk of harm to a critical structure due to the deviating placements.There was no harm nor negative effect to the patient, also not due to the surgery/anesthesia prolongation of ca.20-30min.There were further no remedial actions for the patient done, necessary or planned.Hospitalization was also not prolonged.
|