• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY TALAR DOME SZ 2 TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC INFINITY TALAR DOME SZ 2 TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM; PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 33630022
Medical Device Problem Code Osseointegration Problem (3003)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
Date of Event 06/12/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery due to aseptic loosening.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device is not available for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient; therefore, an evaluation of the device cannot be performed.If additional information becomes available, it will be provided on a supplemental report.
 
Event or Problem Description
The digital stryker prophecy team received a ct scan indicating that the patient may require a revision surgery due to aseptic loosening.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported event could not be confirmed, since the talar component shows little radiolucence and seems to show a little anterior dislocation of the component, but that can only be confirmed with postoperative x-rays or ct after the implantation.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.Upon further investigation of the ct scans, healthcare professionals opined that- the ct scan shows clear radiolucence, anterior cysts and dislocation of the tibial component.Therefore, loosening and migration can be confirmed for the tibia.The talar component shows little radiolucence and seems to show a little anterior dislocation of the component, but that can only be confirmed with postoperative x-rays or ct after the implantation.The underlying cause of the failure is not clear but may be patient related due to poor bone substance.However, failure of total ankle replacement tar over time is a known complication.In case of a planned revision procedure, a medical opinion aiming to determine the root cause of the failure is part of the internal investigation process.Sufficient radiological and clinical information must be provided to enable a meaningful clinical assessment and to identify possible causes of failure.In cases where a ct scan is the only available clinical source, this assessment is limited.No conclusive statement can be provided, because key clinical information e.G., clinical status, exact symptoms, and range of motion of the patient, assessment of the treating physician is missing.The root causes of radiographic findings such as radiolucent areas and bone cysts are often complex and multifactorial and cannot be determined scientifically without this decisive evidence.Due to these limitations, we are unable in such cases to provide statements about the patient, the procedure and or the device in relation to cause of the failure.Based on investigation the issue is caused most likely due to patient related factor i.E., poor bone substance but more detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available to determine the root cause of the complaint event.If the device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INFINITY TALAR DOME SZ 2 TOTAL ANKLE SYSTEM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, ANKLE, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY INC
1023 cherry rd
memphis TN 38117
Manufacturer (Section G)
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
11576 memphis arlington rd
arlington TN 38002
Manufacturer Contact
dannielle stap
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key22460668
Report Number3010667733-2025-00801
Device Sequence Number8826821
Product Code HSN
UDI-Device Identifier00840420122032
UDI-Public(01)00840420122032(11)230811(17)310811(10)1764287
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryAS
PMA/510(K) Number
K123954
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/11/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number33630022
Device Lot Number1764287
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/12/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/18/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/09/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/11/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured08/11/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient Age65 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-