|
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL ORTHOCORDVIOLET W/MO-6 NDLS PK/12; SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
223102 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Discomfort (2330)
|
| Date of Event |
06/18/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient underwent repair surgery of the shoulder and clavicular joint dislocation at the end of (b)(6) 2025.During the surgery, the surgeon used three rgdloop adjustable stnd devices for soft tissue fixation.During the procedure, it was reported that the surgeon cut off the white suture of the device and used two orthocord violet w/mo-6 ndls devices instead to pass the titanium plate for fixation.It was reported that postoperative x-ray was unremarkable.Subsequently, the patient felt shoulder discomfort and went to the hospital for treatment (the specific process, occurrence date, examination results and diagnosis were unknown).On (b)(6) 2025, a second surgery was performed for refixation.During the surgery, it was found that the sutures of the orthocord violet w/mo-6 ndls devices were broken.It was reported that currently, the patient's condition is stable and no further adverse event reports have been received.No additional information was provided.This is report 5 of 5 for (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H11 additional narrative: as of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H11 additional narrative: investigation summary = > the complaint device was implanted in the patient, therefore not returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics and unavailable for a physical evaluation.Manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformance was identified.Based on the current available information, we cannot determine a root cause for the reported failure.If the complaint device is received in the future, we will reopen the complaint and perform the investigation as appropriate.It has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed and there is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|