|
Additional information - this mdr is being submitted to include the below: h6: investigation results under type of investigation, investigation findings, investigation conclusions.H11: investigation summary: revision 21 of (b)(4) does not require a complaint that is type 2 reportable to open a child investigation.This child investigation was opened against a previous revision of (b)(4).Complaint investigation results: a complaint investigation has been initiated under complaint investigation child record (b)(4).The batch 6001292, in question was manufactured at the reynosa site.Device history record (dhr) review: the lot 6001292 was manufactured according to the work instruction (wi) version 61 and manufactured in the line 08 on 14-may-2023, with a total of (b)(4) units.The sub-assembly: gluing of tubing of the lot 3e01349 was manufactured according to the wi version 55 and manufactured in the machine sc07, on 06-may-2023, with a total of (b)(4) units.The sub-assembly: gluing of tubing of the lot 3e01386 was manufactured according to the wi version 55 and manufactured in the machine sc07, on 06-may-2023, with a total of (b)(4) units.Review of the device history record (dhr) showed that all relevant tests required during the related processes had been fulfilled and met the requirements.No deviation was identified, nor maintenance events were recorded related to complaint code.Conclusion summary of complaint investigation: as a result of the following: no non-conformance (nc) raised during production related to complaint code, no trend identified for the lot in question and malfunction code, no further actions are required.This complaint will not require further root cause investigation nor corrective and preventive action (capa) plan.Therefore, this issue will be monitored through the post market surveillance activities.
|