• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT PLUS PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT PLUS PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 6900PTFX27
Medical Device Problem Code Device Stenosis (4066)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 06/18/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11.Additional narrative: surgical/percutaneous intervention is indicated or performed, or harm occurred due to the device, or there is a device malfunction that could cause or contribute to a serious injury.This event is considered a serious injury.The device was not returned for evaluation, as it remains implanted.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a 6900ptfx 27mm mitral valve was disabled via a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of 6 years, 11 months due to severe stenosis.A 9600tfx 29mm transcatheter valve was implanted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11.Additional narrative.Updated h6.Stenosis is a common manifestation of bioprosthetic valve and valved conduit dysfunction and has many potential root causes, including structural valve deterioration (svd), non-structural valve dysfunction (nsvd), endocarditis and/or thrombosis.Bioprosthetic device stenosis is typically related to patient and/or procedural factors and is not typically an indication of a device malfunction related to a manufacturing deficiency.There is no evidence to suggest a manufacturing defect caused or contributed to the reported event.There is insufficient information available regarding patient or procedural factors known to cause or contribute to stenosis.Therefore, a definitive root cause cannot be conclusively determined.The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and showed that this device met all manufacturing and sterilization specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT PLUS PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Common Device Name
REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
one edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key22469578
Report Number2015691-2025-05597
Device Sequence Number14477354
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103163599
UDI-Public(01)00690103163599(17)211129
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateAZ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P860057
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2018
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/21/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/29/2021
Device Model Number6900PTFX27
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/18/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/05/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/10/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/21/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured11/30/2017
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Life Threatening; Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age60 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-