• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIGHTLAB IMAGING, INC. DRAGONFLY¿ OPTIS¿; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIGHTLAB IMAGING, INC. DRAGONFLY¿ OPTIS¿; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC Back to Search Results
Model Number C408645
Medical Device Problem Codes Failure to Advance (2524); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/03/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
A visual inspection and additional testing methods were performed on the returned device.The reported failure to advance was unable to be confirmed as it was related to procedural circumstances.Production record and corrective and preventative actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed there is no indication of a lot specific issue.Based on the reported information and the observations from the returned analysis, the investigation determined that the reported failure to advance appears to be related to operational context.The catheter was observed to be bent, which is consistent with being damaged during use and will contribute to poor device deliverability.The stretched and torn guidewire exit notch is consistent with the catheter being inserted onto a guidewire and force used to remove the catheter from the guidewire but is not related to the reported failure to advance.In this case, it is likely that the catheter damage was caused by the patient¿s anatomical conditions.Based on the results of the complaint investigation there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the procedure was performed in the right coronary artery (rca) with 80% stenosis.The dragonfly optis imaging catheter was used prior to the stent being implanted; however, failed to cross due to the anatomy post stent implantation.Another dragonfly optis catheter was used to complete the procedure.There was no adverse patient effect and there was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.Returned device analysis identified the guidewire exit notch was stretched and torn.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DRAGONFLY¿ OPTIS¿
Common Device Name
CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIGHTLAB IMAGING, INC.
4 robbins rd.
westford MA 01886
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT MEDICAL REG#3009600098
4 robbins rd
westford MA 01886
Manufacturer Contact
lindsey bell
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key22473758
Report Number2024168-2025-07106
Device Sequence Number7940627
Product Code DQO
UDI-Device Identifier00183739000647
UDI-Public(01)00183739000647(17)261024(10)10531354
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K141769
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 07/10/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberC408645
Device Catalogue NumberC408645
Device Lot Number10531354
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/20/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/26/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/10/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/24/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-