• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 TITANIUM LOW-PROFILE IMPLANTABLE PORT, BROVIAC SINGLE-LUMEN, 6.6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 TITANIUM LOW-PROFILE IMPLANTABLE PORT, BROVIAC SINGLE-LUMEN, 6.6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0602190
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Unspecified Infection (1930); Drug Resistant Bacterial Infection (4553); Bacteremia (4846)
Date of Event 01/17/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the litigation process that sometime post a port placement, the patient developed with unspecified infection.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed, and this lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No medical records were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported infection as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.Section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed, and this lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided for review.The medical records allege that the patient underwent explanation of an indwelling low profile port due to pain and discomfort, followed on the same day by implantation of a powerport for immunotherapy delivery via the right internal jugular vein under ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance, with the catheter positioned at the cavoatrial junction and no procedural complications reported.Approximately two and a half months later, the patient presented with fevers and was diagnosed with methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) bacteremia based on blood cultures, prompting surgical removal of the port and catheter, which were removed intact and sent for culture.Approximately ten months later, the patient was again documented to have bacteremia and an infected port a cath and underwent an additional port removal procedure, including excision of the port and catheter, irrigation of the pocket, and closure allowing for drainage.The patient tolerated the procedures without reported complication.Therefore, it can be confirmed that the patient had experienced bacterial infection, drug resistant bacterial infection and bacteremia.However, the relationship to the port is unknown.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.B3, b5, g3, h6 (patient, method, result).Section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through litigation process that, on (b)(6) 2020, the patient underwent a port placement procedure using a powerport for immunotherapy delivery.Approximately two months and eighteen days later, on (b)(6) 2021, the patient was diagnosed with port catheter infection.It was further reported that the patient was diagnosed with mrsa infection and bacteremia.Subsequently on the same day, the port was removed.However, the current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TITANIUM LOW-PROFILE IMPLANTABLE PORT, BROVIAC SINGLE-LUMEN, 6.6F
Common Device Name
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key22477702
Report Number3006260740-2025-04726
Device Sequence Number12900236
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741025549
UDI-Public(01)00801741025549(11)200423(17)241130(10)REEQ2755
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCO
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K050310
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2020
Device Explanted Year2021
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/18/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2024
Device Catalogue Number0602190
Device Lot NumberREEQ2755
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/24/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/02/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/11/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/15/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured04/23/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age50 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-