|
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-apr-2007) is considered to be a best estimate.This emdr represents the bard mesh - composix e/x (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard sepramesh ip (device #4) and additional supplemental emdrs were submitted to represent bard mesh - ventralex (device #2 and device #3).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Per information provided: (b)(6) 2009 ¿ patient was diagnosed with two incisional hernias thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of composix e/x mesh (device #1) and ventralex meshes (device #2, #3).Per op notes, ¿hernia in the midline of the abdomen adjacent to umbilicus was noted.A composix e/x mesh (device #1) was placed the defect and sutured.Then, second hernia was noted inferiorly was repaired using a ventralex mesh (device #2) and tacked to inferior abdominal wall.A weakened point was noted superior to second hernia was repaired with another ventralex mesh (device #3) and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2010 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with the implant of sepramesh ip (device #4).Per op notes, ¿a large amount of adhesions were noted in the midline of abdomen and significant herniation noted in supraumbilical area.A large piece of sepramesh ip (device #4) was placed into the supraumbilical hernia defect and tacked using sorbafix.¿ (b)(6) 2016 ¿ patient was diagnosed with infected mesh and enterocutaneous fistula, adhesions thereby underwent open repair with the removal of meshes (device #1, #2, #3, #4).Per op notes, ¿a large piece of mesh encompassing a large portion of the abdominal wall.There was a central area with bowel stuck to mesh with obvious infection and purulence.The mesh was removed with infected fascia.The small bowel included at least 3 fistulous to the abscess in the small bowel was resected and anastomosis was performed.All meshes (device #1, #2, #3, #4) were removed.The defect was repaired using sutures.¿.
|