| Model Number |
ATEC 0912-20 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Failure to Obtain Sample (2533)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/19/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Lot number of the device not provided by the complainant; therefore, the udi, expiration and manufacturing dates are not known.Device history record (dhr) review was unable to be conducted for the disposable device as the identification numbers were not provided by the complainant.The device involved in this event was not returned for evaluation purposes therefore visual and functional analysis of the product could not be performed.We are unable to confirm a relationship between the device and the issue reported.The information obtained during complaint investigation will be included in our global complaint trending and product surveillance will continue to monitor complaints of this type for adverse trends.If the product is received or additional information is obtained, the investigation will be reopened accordingly per standard operating procedure.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during an atec procedure on (b)(6) 2025, the needle lost suction after coming in contact with the patient.It is reported that the user did not have a back-up device to replace the needle that lost suction; therefore, the procedure was aborted after the skin incision had already been made.No further information is currently available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
An investigation was conducted: it was reported that during an atec procedure on (b)(6) 2025, the needle lost suction after coming in contact with the patient.It is reported that the user did not have a back-up device to replace the needle that lost suction; therefore, the procedure was aborted after the skin incision had already been made.No further information is currently available.The device was not available for return; visual and functional analysis/testing could not be conducted for the described event.The device was not returned for this complaint, and only limited patient-related information was provided.Therefore, a full investigation could not be conducted.Without the returned sample, it is not possible to confirm a definitive root cause of the issue.Root cause analysis did not identify a definitive root cause.The investigation included a comprehensive review of complaint data and risk assessments, but could not perform any testing procedures, because the device was not returned.Conclusion: the reported issue could not be confirmed because the device was not returned.A comprehensive review was conducted, including device history records, complaint data, and risk assessments.Capa/hra/ncr/scar are not deemed required at this moment by this event.Future events will be monitored and trended.Complaint confirmed: no.Device history record (dhr) review: the dhr review was not conducted since the lot/serial number was not provided by the complainant.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|