|
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD ACETLR CUP HAP 52MM W/ IMPTR; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
74120152 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Abscess (1690); Medical device site infection (4845)
|
| Date of Event |
07/18/2012
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication reported that includes reference to the use of a smith+nephew product without evidence about a specific product problem.The reported complication relates to known inherent procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to confirm a relationship between the reported event and the device or identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient underwent a debridement of the left hip on (b)(6) 2012 due to infection, abscess, and granuloma formation.Imaging and clinical findings were consistent with a superinfection and abscess surrounding the prosthetic component.The intervention involved surgical cleaning and antibiotic treatment.No procedural delay or additional complications were reported at the time.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Corrected data: h6 (type of investigation, investigation findings, investigation conclusions).Updated results of investigation: as of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.A review of the historical complaints data for the alleged devices was performed using batch numbers, part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.Similar complaints have been identified for the syn ha ho pf fem and no other similar for the modular head and cup.This failure will continue to be monitored via routine trending.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible.No further escalation actions are required.The available medical documents were reviewed.There is a likely route cause.An infection developing more than 3.5 years after implantation is a late infection predominantly caused by hematogenous seeding.The abscess can be seen as a result of the ¿superinfection.¿ therefore, it cannot be concluded the infection, abscess and subsequent debridement were associated with a mal performance of the implant.The patient impact is determined to be the debridement and antibiotic treatment the root cause can likely be ascribed to non-device related factors.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive patient weight, patient smoking, patient compromised immune system.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|