• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number DRT375
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Blurred Vision (2137)
Date of Event 05/26/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a3b, a4, a5 and a6: unknown, as information was requested but not provided.Section d6b - explant date: not applicable, as lens remains implanted.Section e1 - email address: unknown, as information was requested but not provided.Section e1 - telephone number: (b)(6).Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of this review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.An attempt has been made to obtain missing information.However, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was initially reported that the preloaded intraocular lens (iol) was implanted in the patient's right eye on (b)(6) 2025.Four days after surgery, the patient's distance vision was 0.6p (1.2×s+1.00d c-1.00da75) and near vision was 0.4.The patient is very satisfied with both distance and middle vision, but somewhat dissatisfied with near vision.A replacement is being considered, depending on future test results.No patient injury was reported, and no other medical intervention was required.Through follow-up, we learned that a lens explant was attempted; however, the lens was left implanted because adhesion between the haptics and the posterior capsule had begun, and the zonule was notably weak.The account indicated that if the lens replacement procedure continued any longer, there was a risk of the iol dislodging.Consequently, the haptic that had been removed from one side was returned to the bag, resulting in the discontinuation of the replacement operation.After the procedure, the patient was prescribed with diquas, an ophthalmic solution to treat dry eyes and after some days, the patient seemed to be able to read small letters.No further information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key22503336
Report Number3012236936-2025-000174
Device Sequence Number9303255
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474813106
UDI-Public(01)05050474813106(17)280127
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 07/15/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDRT375
Device Catalogue NumberDRT3750190
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/02/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/14/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured01/26/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
-
-