|
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-aug-2009) is considered to be a best estimate.This emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol mesh ¿ composix l/p (device #2).An additional emdr submitted to represent the bard/davol mesh ¿ composix l/p (device #1) and supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol ventrio mesh (device #3).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Per information provided: on (b)(6) 2009 - patient was diagnosed with symptomatic abdominal incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with composix lp mesh (device #1).Per operative notes, ¿the hernia defect was noted in the anterior abdominal wall and composix lp mesh (device #1) was placed and sutured and tacked.¿ on (b)(6) 2010 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent abdominal incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of composix lp mesh (device #2).Per operative notes, ¿adhesiolysis was performed.The hernia defect was placed with composix lp mesh (device #2) and sutured.The previously placed mesh (device #1) was seen rolled under the hernia defect.The mesh (device #1) was unfurled and sutured and tacked.¿ on (b)(6) 2011 - patient was diagnosed with multiple recurrent lower abdominal wall hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventrio mesh (device #3).Per operative notes, ¿the adhesions of the peritoneum and intestine and old biological mesh was removed.The dome of the bladder was clearly involved in hernia defect.A ventrio mesh (device #3) was placed and sutured.¿ on (b)(6) 2012 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incarcerated incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of two synthetic mesh.Per operative notes, ¿multiple mesh was noted.The hernia sac was encountered and reduced and sutured.Two synthetic mesh was placed in the peritoneum and sutured.¿ on (b)(6) 2012 - patient was diagnosed with infected abdominal wall wound thereby underwent open repair with incision and drainage of abscess, debridement of infected abdominal wound.Per operative notes, ¿the wound with cellulitis was noted and wound vac was placed over it.The purulence was drained.¿ on (b)(6) 2013 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia; abdominal wall abscess and infected abdominal mesh thereby underwent open repair with removal of abdominal wall mesh (device #3) and implant of synthetic mesh.Per operative notes, ¿the abdominal wall mesh with scar tissue was noted in underlay fashion.The mesh was excised; it appeared to be wadded itself into a large ball.Abdominal wall wound was closed with sutures.The hernia defect was repaired with synthetic mesh and sutured.On (b)(6) 2015 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of synthetic mesh and phasix flat mesh (device #4).Per operative notes, ¿dense adhesions with scar tissue were noted.In hypogastric region, hernia was noted in right labia majora.The hernia was dissected, and synthetic mesh was placed in edge of peritoneal opening and phasix flat mesh was placed over the synthetic mesh and sutured.¿.
|