|
|
| Catalog Number |
VCP359H |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/16/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2025 and suture was used.During the procedure, tip of needle snapped off during use.Tip found and suture removed from use.No adverse patient consequences were reported.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).H6 component code: g07002 - device not returned.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained via: did any needle piece(s) fall into the patient? *if yes, was\were the needle piece(s) retrieved during the same procedure? what measures were taken to retrieve the broken piece(s)? was there any additional tissue damage as a result of searching for the needle piece(s)? were there patient consequences? if yes, please explain.Please perform and document the follow up attempt for product return.Please document the shipment tracking number in notes or rmao sections.Provide the source or name and title of external person providing answers to follow-up (external person submitting answers to sales rep or loc/bq).Did any needle piece(s) fall into the patient? no, it was found on the floor.Were there patient consequences? if yes, please explain.No, however the hospital did comment that the incident did cause surgical delays whilst the needle tip was located.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information: d9, h3, h6.H3 investigation summary: a failed suture needle, labeled as (b)(4), was submitted to herrera, stafford and associates, llc (hsa) for fractographic evaluation.The component was identified as product code vcp359h.It was requested that hsa assess the fracture mode of the failure.The product received for analysis was vcp359h.Visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.A fracture was observed near the tip of the needle.The needle was received in two pieces, only one of the mating fracture surfaces was examined for this evaluation.A scanning electron microscope (sem) was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation of (b)(4) revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile fracture mode.Mechanical damage observed coincidental to the fracture provides additional evidence that the failure was induced by mechanical deformation leading to ductile overload.This was a ductile fracture.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|