|
E1: phone = (b)(6).Postal: (b)(6).H3: device evaluation anticipated, but not yet begun.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
As reported, prior to use for an unknown procedure, a roadrunner the firm lt hydrophilic wire guide was found to be unraveled prior to opening the device package.Another wire was opened and used to successfully complete the procedure.The patient did not require any additional procedures or experience any adverse effects due to this event.
|
|
Summary of event: as reported, prior to use for an unknown procedure, a roadrunner the firm lt hydrophilic wire guide was found to be unraveled prior to opening the device package.Another wire was opened and used to successfully complete the procedure.The patient did not require any additional procedures or experience any adverse effects due to this event.Corrected information: d4 (udi) investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the complaint device was also conducted.The complaint device was returned to cook for investigation.The wire was unraveled beneath the coating and the mandril was exposed.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device history record found that one device from a sub-assembly lot did not pass quality control inspections; however, the affected product was scrapped prior to release from cook.A review of complaint history found no additional complaints for this lot number.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, and investigation of the returned device suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured to specification.Although one device from a sub-assembly lot did not pass quality control inspections, the product was scrapped prior to release from cook, there are 100% inspections in place, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot-related complaints have been received from the field.Therefore, it was concluded that there is no evidence that devices manufactured out-of-specification exist in-house or in the field.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that a component failure, unrelated to manufacturing or design, contributed to this event.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed, and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|