| Model Number |
9850EV56US |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
06/30/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The manufacturer's investigation is ongoing and a follow-up report will be submitted when the investigation is complete.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Edwards received notification of a transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (ttvr) procedure involving the evoque system.Valve dropped posterior/septal upon deployment.There is trace central regurgitation, but no paravalvular leak (pvl) was noted during post procedural assessment.The valve was stable, and patient was in stable condition.However, on postoperative day (pod) 1 the patient's valve embolized into the right ventricle (rv) and was taken to surgery.The patient is doing well.The physician was central and coaxial leading up to deployment.The system retracted to level out anchors, but too posterior in position upon deployment and that's why the anchor dropped.The leaflet capture was confirmed on each anchor during the anchor spin.No leaflet pinning observed.The anchors were at the hinge points of the annulus prior to the final valve release.The valve expanded evenly and as expected during ventricular and atrial expansion stages.The valve was at the hinge points for anterior, septal, lateral and posterior as the final position post deployment.Posterior septal is the only one that dropped.As per medical opinion, the perceived root cause of the event is no basal rv os as noted on screening.Volume confirmation was adequate on the day of the procedure.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: per an internal imaging review, the 56 mm evoque valve embolized into the right ventricle at final release.Pod 1 imaging showed further migration, with the device appearing highly unstable and demonstrating significant motion.The root cause was determined to be procedural, primarily due to lack of leaflet capture at multiple anchor points and low deployment depth.Potential contributing factors included suboptimal imaging quality and patient-specific anatomy, such as rv basal oversizing and unfavorable papillary muscle structure.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The following sections were updated/corrected/added: b4, g3, g6, h2, h6, and h11.Additional type of investigation codes that were unable to be added in h6: analysis of images labelling review based on the complaint investigation, the complaint for malposition - valve embolizes into ventricle was confirmed with objective evidence.The device history record review was completed, and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections.No nonconformances related to the complaint event were identified.The imaging evaluation identified lack of leaflet capture as the major contributing factor to the valve embolization.Upon initial release, the valve was deployed too ventricular, with the septal, posterior, and anterior aspects of the valve measuring over 10mm from the annular plane and the majority of the anchors lost contact with the annulus.Throughout the procedure, lack of leaflet capture on 5 consecutive anchors and sub-optimal depth of the valve in relation to the annulus were identified as the major contributing factors to the event.Additional contributing factors are sub-optimal imaging quality, improper echo machine settings, and inaccurate echo view planes.Malposition events such as embolization may be caused by a variety of factors such as device to native anatomy sizing (perimeter-derived diameter), use factors and procedural factors.No preventative or corrective actions are required because there are no confirmed product or labeling/ifu/training material non-conformances affecting distributed product and no other triggers have been met.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|