| Catalog Number |
0115320 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240)
|
| Date of Event |
10/02/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-may-2015) is considered to be a best estimate.This emdr represents the 3dmax (device #2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the 3dmax (device #1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Per additional information provided: on (b)(6) 2015 ¿ patient was diagnosed with incarcerated right inguinal hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of two 3dmax mesh (device #1 and #2).Per operative notes, ¿hernia sac was dissected completely and hernia was repaired with two 3dmax mesh.The first 3dmax mesh (device #1) was inserted with cord slit and other 3dmax mesh (device #2) was placed over the first mesh (device #1) as buttress repair with sutures.¿ on (b)(6) 2018¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent right inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of perfix plug (device #3).Per operative notes, ¿the mass was identified at the pubic tubercle and noted to be closely adherent to the oval mesh (device #1 and #2).The mass was excised.Recurrent indirect inguinal hernia was identified and placed with perfix plug (device #3) and secured with sutures.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|