• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750CM20A
Medical Device Problem Code Burst Container or Vessel (1074)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/23/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is ongoing.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported by the field clinical specialist, during a transcatheter tavr procedure with a sapien 3 ultra resilia valve, the commander delivery system balloon burst during the deployment phase.The rupture was attributed to heavy calcification in the sinotubular junction (stj).This rupture led to only partial deployment of the valve.The valve was about 85% deployed.Imaging revealed a pressure drop during inflation, and blood was observed in the syringe.The inflation/deflation time was approximately 10 seconds.No asymmetrical inflation was observed during the procedure.Despite the balloon rupture, the commander delivery system was removed without complications.Upon removal of the devices, the balloon exhibited a longitudinal tear, but there was no damage to other components of the delivery system or sheath, and no leakage was noted.A new commander delivery system was prepared and the valve was successfully implanted.The patient was in stable condition following the event and no patient injury or complications were reported.The root cause of the event was determined to be the calcification in the stj.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
A supplemental mdr is being submitted for engineering evaluation findings.Sections g6, h2, and conclusions in this section have been updated.H6 code was added to type of investigation.H6 codes were corrected: investigation findings, investigation conclusions.The event reported is an anticipated in the risk management documentation for transcatheter heart valve procedures.A previous investigation into this type of event is captured in an edwards lifesciences technical summary and applies to this complaint.Additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The device was not returned for evaluation.Due to the unavailability of the complaint device, engineering was unable to perform any visual inspection, functional testing, or dimensional analysis.Per the technical summary, the instructions for use (ifu), current risk mitigations including design and manufacturing controls, and training manuals have been reviewed, and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.The complaint for the balloon burst was confirmed based on the available information.Any updates or additional findings will be submitted in accordance with fda reporting requirements.Available information suggests calcification likely contributed to the event as the imagery of patient anatomy shows calcification was present in the landing zone.The presence of calcification can create a challenging anatomy for balloon inflation.While the balloons are sufficiently designed and tested to ensure the burst pressure is at or above the rated burst pressure, calcified nodules can compromise the structure of the balloon wall via following mechanisms such as puncture, local overstretching, open cell impingement, or stress concentration.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.Since no edwards product defects or labeling deficiencies were identified, no corrective or preventative action is required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM
Common Device Name
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key22546780
Report Number2015691-2025-05875
Device Sequence Number15207212
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103207811
UDI-Public(01)00690103207811(17)260417(10)65735225
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateWI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P140031
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/22/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/17/2026
Device Model Number9750CM20A
Device Lot Number65735225
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/23/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/06/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/18/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/22/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured04/17/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age84 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-