|
The device has not yet been received thus a proper device analysis could not be completed nor the reported issue confirmed.Based on the information provided, the risk assessment for the lucia 3-piece product, and our experience, we have determined that the following factors may have caused or contributed to the reported issue: off-label use of the yamane technique: the ct lucia 602 lens is not validated for use with the yamane scleral fixation technique.This off-label method introduces rotational forces and anchoring dynamics that are not accounted for in the design specifications of the lens.In this case, the surgeon reported an iol with a kinked haptic which ultimately required explantation.The haptics, while ideal for traditional in-the-bag implantation, may not provide the necessary resistance or stability when fixed externally via the yamane technique.The product was manufactured according to specifications, and no product-related deficiency was identified.The reported failure is attributable to off-label handling, not a product malfunction.The device history records were reviewed and there were no non-conformities or deviations noted during the manufacturing of the lens that would have caused or contributed to the nature of this complaint.Additionally, our lenses are 100% inspected before they leave our manufacturing site.Therefore, we are confident that the lens was processed per standard operating procedures and inspections and have met all criteria for release.
|
|
It was reported that an ct lucia 602 lens (iol) with a kinked haptic was explanted.The customer confirmed no damage was noted during device preparation, and the procedure utilized a zeiss injector with a z28 cartridge.A second zeiss lens was implanted to complete the surgery, though the exact placement (sulcus or capsular bag) is unknown.The case was prolonged by approximately 15 minutes due to the removal of the damaged lens.The yamane technique was employed during the procedure, and no patient injury occurred.
|