| Catalog Number |
MCR092030 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Separation Failure (2547)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
07/16/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer ref# (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Section d2b ¿ procode: krd/hcg.Section h3 - the device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A healthcare professional reported that during a coil embolization of the anterior communicating artery, the physician attempted to detach a freeform mini 2mm x 3cm coil (mcr092030, 31077163) with a mechanical detachment handle (mdh1, lot unknown), however failed to detach.He then went to mechanical break that also failed to detach, the coil was removed from the patient.There was no harm to the patient.Additional event information received on 18-jul-2025 indicated that a prowler select lpes microcatheter was used.Two coils were previously implanted.There was no resistance during advancement of the device through the microcatheter or positioning difficulty in the aneurysm.One attempt was used with the detachment handle.There was no visible damage when they took the coil out of the hoop.The vessel was not excessively tortuous or had acute bends.There was a three-minute procedural delay with no result of patient adverse consequence.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer ref# (b)(4).Updated sections on this medwatch: b4, d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6 and h11.Complaint conclusion: a healthcare professional reported that during a coil embolization of the anterior communicating artery, the physician attempted to detach a freeform mini 2mm x 3cm coil (mcr092030, 31077163) with a mechanical detachment handle (mdh1, lot unknown), however failed to detach.He then went to mechanical break that also failed to detach, the coil was removed from the patient.There was no harm to the patient.Additional event information received on 18-jul-2025 indicated that a prowler select lpes microcatheter was used.Two coils were previously implanted.There was no resistance during advancement of the device through the microcatheter or positioning difficulty in the aneurysm.One attempt was used with the detachment handle.There was no visible damage when they took the coil out of the hoop.The vessel was not excessively tortuous or had acute bends.There was a three-minute procedural delay with no result of patient adverse consequence.The device was returned to j&j medtech for further evaluation.A non-sterile freeform mini 2mm x 3cm coil was received contained in the decontamination pouch.Upon receiving the device, visual inspection was performed, and the embolic coil was found severely stretched and separated in two pieces.The proximal end of the embolic coil remained attached to the delivery system.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 31077163 number, and no non-conformances related to the malfunction were identified.The issue reported regarding the failure to detach could not be evaluated due to the severe damage on the embolic coil.These damages were not originally reported, and the exact time of occurrence cannot be determined; therefore, are not considered related to the issue reported.As part of j&j medtech quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Devices undergo 100% inspection at different points during the manufacturing process to prevent damages from leaving the facility.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no capa activity is required.The instructions for use (ifu) contain the following recommendations: 1.Remove the detacher from the protective packaging and place it within the sterile field.The detacher is packaged separately for single patient use only.2.Confirm again under fluoroscopy that the coil alignment marker of the delivery tube creates a ¿t¿ with the proximal marker of the microcatheter.3.Verify that the rhv is firmly locked around the delivery tube to ensure that the coil does not move during connection process.Ensure the delivery tube is straight between the rhv and the detacher.4.Hold the delivery tube approximately 3 inches from proximal end and bring the detacher over the delivery tube until a firm stop is felt.5.Maintain the delivery tube position within the detacher and use a thumb to pull back the slider on the detacher.6.Continue to pull on the slider until end of travel or a click is heard.Gently release the slider until it returns to starting position or a second click is heard.Remove detacher by slowly withdrawing it from the delivery tube.Note: detacher must remain in sterile field until the procedure is completed.7.Fluoroscopically verify that the coil is detached by gently pulling back the delivery tube approximately 1cm.If the coil has detached, remove the delivery tube from the microcatheter.8.If the coil has not detached, repeat steps 3-7.If 2 unsuccessful detachments occur, discard the detacher and proceed to the manual break section.9.Repeat steps 1-8 until the procedure is completed.Discard the detacher.Caution: always perform fluoroscopic verification of detachment prior to withdrawing the delivery system fully.Failure to do so may lead to an embolic complication.10.After detaching the coil, remove the delivery tube from the microcatheter and discard.11.Repeat the above sequence for all additional coils until the procedure is complete.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|