| Model Number |
12TLW805F35 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Burst Container or Vessel (1074)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The fogarty embolectomy catheter was received by our product evaluation laboratory for a full examination.As received, the balloon was found to be ruptured at central area.The ruptured edges did not appeared to match at the ruptured location.Per the ifu " balloon rupture and catheter separation as a result of excessive pull force applied to remove adherent material are the most frequent causes of reported failures." and " to minimize the risk of vessel damage, balloon rupture, or tip detachment, do not exceed the maximum recommended inflation volume and pull force for each size catheter." no visible damage was observed from distal and proximal windings and catheter body.The through lumen was found to be patent and did not leak.An engineering investigation will be performed in order to consider any potential factors that may have contributed to this complaint.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported, while testing this fogarty embolectomy catheter, the balloon burst.There was no allegation of patient injury.The device was received for evaluation.As per evaluation results, the balloon was found to be ruptured at central area.The ruptured edges did not appeared to match at the ruptured location.Patient demographic data unable to be obtained.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Added information to section h6 (type of investigation) updated section h6 (component code), h6 (impact code), h6 (investigation findings) and h6 (investigations conclusions).The manufacturing records were reviewed for the lot involved and there is no indication of a related nonconformance.All process parameters were met and inspections passed successfully.Based on the available information there is no evidence that supports or confirms the failure mode being evaluated to be associated to a manufacturing/design defect.As part of the manufacturing process the units go through balloon and winding inspection process.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|