|
Block b3: the exact event onset date is unknown.The provided event date of january 17, 2024 was chosen as a best estimate based on the date of the first revision surgery.Block d4, h4: the lot number does not provide a match in the system search; therefore, the device manufacture and expiration dates cannot be determined.Block d4: detailed product information was not provided to bsc.Based on the nature of the information provided to bsc, it is not possible to perform a good faith effort to obtain additional information.Because the product is unknown at this time, we are unable to provide the complete unique identifier (udi) # and other product specific information.If additional details become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.Block e1: this event was reported by the patient's legal representation.The implant surgeon is: (b)(6) hospital.Block h6: the following imdrf patient codes capture the events below: e2330 for pain.E2006 for mesh erosion.E2328 for the stone formed on the mesh.The following imdrf impact codes capture the events below: f1905 for the mesh revision surgeries.F1903 for the complete removal in (b)(6) 2024.
|
|
It was reported that the patient underwent placement of the advantage fit mid-urethral sling during a pelvic surgery for stress urinary incontinence, alongside operative laparoscopy for pelvic pain, hysteroscopy, and diagnostic cystoscopy.The procedure was completed without patient complication.No bleeding or intraoperative concerns were noted, and the patient tolerated the procedure well.Following the procedure, the patient began experiencing chronic pelvic pain.On (b)(6) 2024, she underwent a cystoscopy with laser excision of bladder mesh.During the procedure, a segment of the sling was observed traversing the right lateral bladder wall, with a stone adherent to the mesh.A 350-watt laser was used to excise the mesh starting at its distal edge.The proximal ends were also lasered back behind the bladder wall, avoiding deeper dissection to prevent cystotomy.The stone and mesh material were removed.Following this, the patient continued to experience symptoms.On (b)(6) 2024, she underwent a second cystoscopic procedure for laser ablation of residual mesh.A small amount of eroded mesh was again identified at the right lateral bladder sidewall, with some sediment present.The previously treated proximal edge appeared completely healed.A 500-micron laser fiber was used to ablate the remaining exposed mesh beneath the urothelium.A minor area of mucosal bleeding was controlled with a bugbee electrode, and no bladder injury occurred.Due to ongoing symptoms and recurrent erosion, the patient underwent a third revision on (b)(6) 2024, involving vaginal excision of the sling mesh with cystotomy.During this procedure, mesh was identified deep and unusually proximal, penetrating the right lateral bladder wall with a small adherent stone.After identifying the mesh via combined vaginal and cystoscopic guidance, it was fully excised using sharp dissection.A small bladder incision (cystotomy) was created to allow complete removal.
|