|
A health care professional reported with a description, defective intra ocular lens.Additional information was received and stated, lens loop was stuck in the injector.The surgery was completed by implanting a new iol of same model and power.There was no patient contact.
|
|
Additional information was provided in d.9.,h.3.,h.6 and h.11.The device with the lens was returned loose in the carton.The plunger lock and lens stop were removed.The plunger was oriented correctly.Inadequate viscoelastic was observed in the device.No viscoelastic was observed on or under the plunger.A small amount of viscoelastic was observed in the tip of the device.The plunger was advanced under the lens into the nozzle.The lens was partially advanced into the nozzle entry area.The nozzle was removed and cleaned for further evaluation.The lens was removed during cleaning.Top coat dye stain testing was conducted with acceptable results.Product history records were reviewed and the documentation indicated the product met release criteria.A non-qualified viscoelastic was used.A plunger underride was observed resulting in the reported haptic issue and additional lens damage.The root cause for the reported complaint may be related to a failure to follow the instructions for use (ifu).A non-qualified viscoelastic was used.The ifu instructs: during device preparation and implantation of the company intra ocular lens (iol) with the company preloaded delivery system, an company qualified ophthalmic viscoelastic device (ovd) should be used.The use of an unqualified ovd may cause damage to the lens and potential complications during the device preparation and implantation steps.Inadequate viscoelastic was also observed.The directions for use (dfu) instructs: fill the device until viscoelastic can be observed flowing to the line on the nozzle tip.This will require approximately 0.2 ml of viscoelastic.If inadequate viscoelastic is placed in the device this will cause inadequate coverage of the lens fold path which may cause the lens to advance incorrectly or become stuck in the device allowing the plunger to underride the lens.Plunger underride may occur: due to rapid advancement faster than the ifu recommended rate.Due to the use of a non-qualified viscoelastic.Material properties of non-qualified ovds may contribute to underfill, overfill, misfolding of the haptics, or other inconsistent folding outcomes.If inadequate viscoelastic is placed in the device, this will cause inadequate coverage of the lens fold path which may cause the lens to advance incorrectly or become stuck in the device allowing the plunger to underride the lens.If the operating room temperature is too high (greater than 23 degree centigrade / 73 degree fahrenheit) lens folding consistency is negatively affected, the lens is more adherent and this may inhibit lens advancement.Any of the above listed causes alone, or in combination, may create the reported event.Top coat dye stain testing was conducted with acceptable results.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|