• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC HIRES 90K¿ IMPLANT; COCHLEAR IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC HIRES 90K¿ IMPLANT; COCHLEAR IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Model Number CI-1400-02H
Medical Device Problem Codes Mechanical Problem (1384); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Failure of Implant (1924); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
Date of Event 08/01/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Event or Problem Description
The recipient is reportedly experiencing sound quality issues.Device testing revealed short circuits and abnormal results.Programming adjustments have been made; however, the issue did not resolve.Revision surgery is under consideration.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section b.3, d.6b.Correction section h.6.The recipient's device was explanted.The recipient was reimplanted with another advanced bionics cochlear device.A review of the device history record was completed and no anomalies were noted.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information section h.6.Advanced bionics considers the investigation into this reportable event as closed.The external visual inspection revealed the electrode was severed and silicone damage was observed on the top and bottom cover of the device.These are believed to have occurred during revision surgery.The photographic imaging inspection revealed broken wires in the fantail region.System lock was verified.The condition of the electrode prevented an electrical test from being performed.The device passed the electrical tests performed.The device passed the mechanical tests performed.X-ray inspection revealed broken wires in the fantail region.It is believed that these breaks caused the sound quality concerns and short circuits reported.A corrective action was implemented.This version of the hires 90k device is no longer distributed.This is the final report.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d.9.Disclaimer: advanced bionics does not intend that this report be any admission of liability, fault or product defect.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HIRES 90K¿ IMPLANT
Common Device Name
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ADVANCED BIONICS, LLC
28515 westinghouse place
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer Contact
laurel masamitsu
28515 westinghouse place
valencia, CA 91355
MDR Report Key22588031
Report Number3006556115-2025-01054
Device Sequence Number9392824
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier07630016816260
UDI-Public(01)07630016816260(11)150721(17)170731
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
P960058
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2015
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/16/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/31/2017
Device Model NumberCI-1400-02H
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/24/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/25/2025
11/18/2025
12/08/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/21/2015
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age11 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-