|
A pharmacist reported that during intraocular lens (iol) implant procedure, an iol was not implanted placement failure.Surgeon forgot that t4 implants above 21.5d had a 2.6 mm tip, so the implant came completely out of the incision, no patient impact.Then enlarged the incision and the back-up implant was placed.
|
|
Additional information was provided in h.3., h.6.And h.11.The product was not returned for analysis.Additional information: it is stated in the file that "the surgeon forgot that t4 implants above 21.5d had a 2.6 mm tip, so the implant came completely out of the incision, no patient impact.What's more, she enlarged the incision, and the back-up implant was placed".The root cause for the reported complaint appears to be a coincidental event that was unrelated to the product as it is stated in the file that "the surgeon forgot that t4 implants above 21.5d had a 2.6 mm tip, so the implant came completely out of the incision, no patient impact.What's more, she enlarged the incision, and the back-up implant was placed".Company product specification sheet instructs that this company model 23.0d - c nozzle, requires = 2.6 mm incision.Based on this information, the product did not cause/contribute to the event.Based on the results from the product history record, the products met release criteria.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|