|
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES COMMANDER DELVIERY SYTEM WITH SAPIEN 3; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
9750CM20A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
06/30/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation ongoing.This is one of two manufacturer reports being submitted for this case.Please reference related manufacturer report no: 2015691-2025-06070.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported by the field clinical specialist, the patient was an urgent add on tavr in savr case with a non-edwards valve in the aortic position.Per the ct measurements, the patient had minimal valve to coronary (vtc) distance and valve to aorta (vta) distance.The patient was not a surgical candidate, so the team decided to perform a unicorn procedure on the right cusp and snorkel stent on the left coronary artery.The team was successfully able to burn through the right cusp but when a 4mm pta balloon was inserted to dilate the cusp opening, patient decompensated.A 20 mm s3ur valve was prepped per ifu, and team attempted to deliver the valve via unicorn approach but they were unable to advance the valve through the surgical valve cusp- at this point implanter decided to deploy the valve.The valve partially crossed the cups via unicorn and would not fully pass through and at the point they deployed the valve, and it landed high inside the surgical valve.The cusp perf was then dilated with a bigger balloon and a new 20mm s3ur was then deployed at the intended placement inside the savr.Patient was unstable, cpr was being performed during this time.The patient was never able to recover from the decompensated state and passed away after a long unsuccessful resuscitation attempt.No effusion, dissection, coronary obstructions were noted.The patient had severe mr, severe as and was in poor cardiac health.Implanter stated cause of death as ''stunned ventricles'' (the heart muscle went into a "stunned" state when it stops contracting).No damage was noted when the devices were removed from the patient.The patient was not alive at the end of the procedure.The valve was successfully implanted.There was no central leak.There was no use error that led to any negative outcomes or patient injury.There was no device malfunction/difficulty using the device during case.A 3mensio is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for evaluation.The 3mensio imagery provided was reviewed and did not reveal any relevant information pertinent to the investigation.The reported event does not allege a malfunction that could be related to an edwards manufacturing deficiency and/or one was not confirmed through investigation.In addition, the event does not allege a labeling issue; therefore, no dhr review is required.As the complaint is unable to be confirmed and there is no evidence to support the failure was the result of a design / manufacturing non-conformance, a lot history review is not required.As no device was returned and there is no evidence to support a manufacturing/design defect potentially contributed to the complaint, a manufacturing mitigation review is not required.The commander delivery system ifu, commander delivery system procedural manual and sapien 3 ultra resilia aortic valve in valve patient screening and procedural supplement were reviewed.No ifu/training deficiencies were identified.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The crossing difficulty was unable to be confirmed as no relevant imagery was provided for evaluation.The reported event does not allege a malfunction that could be related to an edwards manufacturing deficiency and/or one was not confirmed through investigation.A review of the ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.Furthermore, no abnormalities were reported during device unpacking or preparation.In this case, it is likely that the 4mm balloon initially used to dilate the cusp opening was too small to accommodate the 20mm thv, potentially obstructing the path for the delivery system to cross.While a definitive root cause is unknown, available information suggests that procedural factors (inadequate bav) may have contributed to the reported event.A product risk assessment (pra) is not required because there are no confirmed product or labeling/ifu/training material non-conformances affecting distributed product and no other trigger has been met.A capa/scar is not required because an edwards/supplier defect which could have resulted in the complaint was not confirmed.The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.As such, neither a product risk assessment, nor corrective or preventative actions are required.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|