• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number G11636
Medical Device Problem Code Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 07/17/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, during an ¿angio¿ of the leg via a contralateral approach, the hub of a flexor raabe guiding sheath separated upon removal of the device, with the dilator in place.The anatomy was reportedly very tortuous and tight, and the bifurcation was steep and/or calcified.An unspecified cook 635 stent was used through the sheath during the procedure.Resistance was encountered during insertion and/or removal of the sheath.The sheath was pulled from the patient, and the procedure was completed successfully.The patient was reportedly ¿fine¿.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures or experience any adverse effects due to this event.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Additional information: d9.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Correction: d4 primary udi.Summary of event: as reported, during an ¿angio¿ of the leg via a contralateral approach, the hub of a flexor raabe guiding sheath separated upon removal of the device, with the dilator in place.The anatomy was reportedly very tortuous and tight, and the bifurcation was steep and/or calcified.An unspecified cook 635 stent was used through the sheath during the procedure.Resistance was encountered during insertion and/or removal of the sheath.The sheath was pulled from the patient, and the procedure was completed successfully.The patient was reportedly ¿fine¿.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures or experience any adverse effects due to this event.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of a customer provided photo was conducted as well.The complaint device was not returned to cook for investigation.However, cook examined a photo the customer provided that shows that sheath separated from the hub.The dilator was inserted into the sheath as the customer reported.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device history record and complaint history found no discrepancies or additional complaints on the lot.The product ifu states, ¿if resistance is encountered during advancement of flexor sheath, assess cause of resistance and consider dilation of any restriction identified or consider alternate treatment strategy.If flexor sheath is advanced through resistance, force to remove the sheath will be higher, increasing the risk of sheath material or hub separation upon withdrawal.¿ a review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The information provided upon review of the customer testimony, customer supplied photo, dmr, ifu, and dhr suggests that there is evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded patient anatomy contributed to this incident.The user reported the anatomy was very tortuous and tight, and the bifurcation was steep and/or calcified.Resistance was also encountered during insertion and/or removal of the device.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed, and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FLEXOR RAABE GUIDING SHEATH
Common Device Name
DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key22631858
Report Number1820334-2025-00902
Device Sequence Number12800654
Product Code DYB
UDI-Device Identifier00827002116368
UDI-Public(01)00827002116368(17)271015(10)16295873
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNJ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K142829
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/22/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberG11636
Device Catalogue NumberKCFW-6.0-38-70-RB-RAABE
Device Lot Number16295873
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/17/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer09/04/2025
01/12/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/28/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/18/2025
01/22/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured10/15/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-