• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. SFXSYM PDS+ UNI VIO 18IN 3-0 SA SH; SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. SFXSYM PDS+ UNI VIO 18IN 3-0 SA SH; SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SXPP1A410
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 07/25/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4) this is a combination product, and the event has been reviewed for both the suture and the triclosan.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H6 component code: g07002 device not returned.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Please provide the patient's demographic information including age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure name of index surgical procedure? the diagnosis and indication for the index surgical procedure? what was the initial approach for the index surgical procedure? (open, laparoscopic or other)? on what tissue was the suture used? what was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? was the fixation tab seated against the tissue at the initiation of suture use during the index procedure? were two reverse stitches performed across the incision prior to closure? what instruments were used to grasp the needle? where was the needle grasped during use? were x-rays performed to localize the needle fragment? what was the size of the needle used? what was the size of the broken needle fragment? were all needle fragments removed from the patient after converting to an open procedure? did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? other relevant patient history/concomitant medications? what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? what is the patient's current status? will product be returned? if so, please provide the return date and tracking information.Surgeon¿s name?.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2025 and a barbed suture was used.During the procedure, the needle broke and the broken needle fell into the patient's body.The procedure was converted to an open surgery to retrieve the broken needle.At this moment, the patient is stable.Additional information was requested.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint#: (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformance's were identified.Additional information: h6 type of investigation.Corrected information: b1, b2, h1, h6 health effect - clinical code, h6 health effect - impact code.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: the event description need to update: the operation on patient is open spinal surgery, and operation time was not prolonged.There is no convert to open surgery operation and no patient injury was reported.After investigation, the patient underwent open spinal surgery on (b)(6) 2025.(the specific patient's diagnosis and surgical name were unknown).The operator used the suture sxpp1a410 to perform the subcutaneous tissue suturing in a continuous suturing method.During the suturing, the needle broke (the specific length of broken end was unknown) and fell into the patient.The operator immediately visually searched for and removed the broken needle.After removal, the integrity of the needle was checked.The operation was completed routinely after confirming that no foreign body remained in the patient.There was no harm to the patient due to this event.The patient was in stable condition currently.No subsequent adverse event report was received.Please confirm: was the needle removed during the initial procedure of an open spinal procedure? yes.Does the needle/needle piece remain retained in the patient? no.The following information was requested but unavailable: please provide the patient's demographic information including age, gender, weight, bmi at the time of index procedure.What was the tissue condition (normal, thin, calcified, fragile, diseased)? was the fixation tab seated against the tissue at the initiation of suture use during the index procedure? were two reverse stitches performed across the incision prior to closure? what instruments were used to grasp the needle? where was the needle grasped during use? were x-rays performed to localize the needle fragment? what was the size of the needle used? what was the size of the broken needle fragment? were all needle fragments removed from the patient after converting to an open procedure? did the operating surgeon observe any suture deficiency or anomaly before, during, after the suture placement or during any re-operation? other relevant patient history/concomitant medications? what is the physician¿s opinion as to the etiology of or contributing factors to this event? what is the patient's current status? surgeon¿s name?.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4) date sent to the fda: 9/29/2025.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H6 component code: c22 - photo analysis.Additional information: d9, h3, h6.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.H3 investigational summary: the product received for analysis was sxpp1a410.Visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.A fracture was observed at the suture attachment of the needle.The needle was received in two pieces, only one of the mating fracture surfaces was examined for this evaluation.A scanning electron microscope was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile fracture mode.This was a ductile fracture.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.Photo analysis: this is an analysis for a photo submitted to ethicon for evaluation.During the visual analysis, the following was observed: the photo shows a foil labeled as sxpp1a410, with the needle broken in the attach area.The image is not clear to determine the failure mode.Based on the photo review, the event reported is confirmed, however no conclusion or root cause could be determined.Hands on device analysis may provide the additional evidence necessary to confirm the root cause of the reported event.As part of ethicon quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SFXSYM PDS+ UNI VIO 18IN 3-0 SA SH
Common Device Name
SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
1000 route 202
raritan NJ 08869
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.-JUAREZ
calle durango #2751
ciudad juarez 32575
MX   32575
Manufacturer Contact
orla o'mahony
1000 route 202
raritan, NJ 08869
3035526892
MDR Report Key22643140
Report Number2210968-2025-08732
Device Sequence Number12952502
Product Code NEW
UDI-Device Identifier10705031219311
UDI-Public(01)10705031219311(17)261231(10)105Q63
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K141776
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/29/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberSXPP1A410
Device Lot Number105Q63
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/25/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/11/2025
09/04/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/29/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/14/2025
09/29/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/14/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-