|
The following sections were updated/corrected/added: b4, g3, g6, h2, h6, and h11.Additional type of investigation codes that were unable to be added in h6: labelling review.The complaint for malposition - valve migrates from deployment position was confirmed with other empirical evidence by edwards personnel.Based on the device history record review, there were no non-conformances related to the issue observed and the device passed all manufacturing specifications.Potential contributing factors to these findings include suboptimal valve positioning and leaflet engagement, anchor placement and interaction with the annulus, as well as the patient's complex cardiac history, including a prior heart transplant.Since no manufacturing non-conformances were confirmed and no ifu/training deficiencies were identified, no corrective/preventative actions are required.The complaint for central regurgitation was confirmed with was confirmed with other empirical evidence by edwards personnel.Based on the device history record review, there were no non-conformances related to the issue observed and the device passed all manufacturing specifications.Potential contributing factors to central regurgitation include valve migration from deployment position which has potential contributing factors of operational context.Due to malposition, the valve follows path of least resistance into the ventricle and is not able to seal to the annulus.Since no manufacturing non-conformances were confirmed and no ifu/training deficiencies were identified, no corrective/preventative actions are required.
|