| Model Number |
280019MM |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Intravalvular regurgitation (4068)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
07/08/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11.Additional narrative.Surgical/percutaneous intervention is indicated or performed, or harm occurred due to the device, or there is a device malfunction that could cause or contribute to a serious injury.This event is considered a serious injury.The device was not returned for evaluation, as it remains implanted.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a model 2800 19mm pericardial valve in pulmonary position was disabled via a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of 8 years, 2 months due to regurgitation.A 9600tfx 23mm transcatheter valve was implanted successfully.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11.Additional narrative.Updated h6.Based on the information available, the device was intentionally used outside the way it was designed and intended.The performance, safety, efficacy, longevity, and durability of bioprosthetic valves have not been determined when the product is used outside the scope of its intended use and/or its studied population.Regurgitation is a common manifestation of bioprosthetic valve and valved conduit dysfunction.Common intraoperative factors that may cause or contribute to acute post-procedural regurgitation include device distortion; device interaction with patient anatomy or other devices; leaflet damage, and incorrectly sized valve seated.Non-structural valve dysfunction (nsvd), endocarditis and/or thrombosis may also cause or contribute to acute post-procedural regurgitation.Complaints reported with regurgitation as the primary complaint code are not typically attributed to manufacturing-related nonconformances.A device history record (dhr) review was performed, and no relevant non-conformances were identified.There is no evidence to suggest a manufacturing defect caused or contributed to the reported event.Based on the information available, the most likely root cause is patient factors, including patient age at implant.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|