• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: Lutonix, Inc Lutonix 035AV Drug Coated PTA Dilation Catheter; Drug Coated Balloon PTA Catheter

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

Lutonix, Inc Lutonix 035AV Drug Coated PTA Dilation Catheter; Drug Coated Balloon PTA Catheter Back to Search Results
Model Number 9010
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Encephalopathy (1833); Stenosis (2263); Restenosis (4576)
Date of Event 07/03/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.Section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the results of the study (av pas) that sometime later post percutaneous transluminal angioplasty procedure by using lutonix dilation catheter on the basilic vein of the left upper arm for dilation of stenosis, the subject had stenosis on the target vein.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the results of the study (av pas) that sometime later post percutaneous transluminal angioplasty procedure by using lutonix dilation catheter on the basilic vein of the left upper arm for dilation of stenosis, the subject had stenosis on the target vein.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labelling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.Section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the results of the clinical trial (av pas) that sometime later post percutaneous transluminal angioplasty procedure by using lutonix dilation catheter on the basilic vein of the left upper arm for dilation of stenosis, the subject had stenosis on the target vein.It was further reported that the patient had an adverse event of encephalopathy.The relationship of the event with the device, procedure, or av access circuit intervention was not reported.The event did not result in a re-intervention.However, the current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labelling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.B5, g3, h6 (patient).Section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the results of the clinical trial (av pas) that sometime later post percutaneous transluminal angioplasty procedure by using lutonix dilation catheter on the basilic vein of the left upper arm for dilation of stenosis, the subject had stenosis on the target vein.It was further reported that the patient had an adverse event of left arteriovenous fistula outflow stenosis.The relationship of the event with the device, procedure is not related but definitely related to the av access circuit.The event did result in a re-intervention with initial stenosis percent of fifty and final residual stenosis of forty.However, the current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.B5, g3, h6 (patient).Section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
Lutonix 035AV Drug Coated PTA Dilation Catheter
Common Device Name
Drug Coated Balloon PTA Catheter
Manufacturer (Section D)
Lutonix, Inc
9409 science center dr
new hope 55428
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. Bard, Inc. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury 12804
Manufacturer Contact
michael gaffney
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
+1(480)303-2689
MDR Report Key22661990
Report Number3006513822-2025-00056
Device Sequence Number14381589
Product Code PRC
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter StateIA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P170003
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Study
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/30/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/06/2025
Device Model Number9010
Device Catalogue NumberLX35751040V
Device Lot NumberGFJQ1851
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/03/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/12/2025
01/26/2026
08/01/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/30/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/04/2025
01/28/2026
08/06/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age62 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight129 LB
Patient RaceWhite
-
-