• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ENDOTAK RELIANCE SG; IMPLANTABLE LEAD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ENDOTAK RELIANCE SG; IMPLANTABLE LEAD Back to Search Results
Model Number 0181
Medical Device Problem Code High impedance (1291)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 07/08/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If pertinent information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that upon review of boston scientific latitude remote monitoring system stored data, we identified evidence that this lead exhibited high shock impedance measurements of greater than 125 ohms.No adverse patient effects have been reported.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that upon review of boston scientific latitude remote monitoring system stored data, we identified evidence that this lead exhibited high shock impedance measurements of greater than 125 ohms.No adverse patient effects have been reported.Additional information was received that this right ventricular (rv) lead was explanted and replaced with a new rv lead.A return request is being sent.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
If pertinent information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that upon review of boston scientific latitude remote monitoring system stored data, we identified evidence that this lead exhibited high shock impedance measurements of greater than 125 ohms.No adverse patient effects have been reported.Additional information was received that this right ventricular (rv) lead was explanted and replaced with a new rv lead.A return request is being sent.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, a thorough evaluation of the lead was performed.The lead was returned in two severed segments approximately 135 millimeters from the terminal end with an extracting stylet stuck in the tip section of the lead.Surface abrasion was noted approximately 370mm from the tip end.Cuts in the suture sleeve and insulation were observed consistent with explant damage.Testing was completed to assess lead electrical performance.Measurements throughout this test was within normal limits.Visual examination of the lead noted calcification on the outer insulation, shocking coils and helix.Investigation of the available information/data determined that the observed gradual rise in low voltage shock impedance (lvsi) measurements was associated with calcification, as there was no conclusive evidence of compromised electrical integrity of the lead.This condition may develop over time and can be reflected in a gradual and sustained increase in shock impedance measurements.Boston scientific issued a field safety notice to physicians in july 2025 regarding the potential for reliance defibrillation leads with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (eptfe) coating to exhibit a pattern of gradually increasing lvsi measurements due to calcification, which may result in elevated high voltage shock impedance (hvsi) measurements and reduced shock efficacy.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, a thorough evaluation of the lead was performed.The lead was returned in two severed segments approximately 135 millimeters from the terminal end with an extracting stylet stuck in the tip section of the lead.Surface abrasion was noted approximately 370mm from the tip end.Cuts in the suture sleeve and insulation were observed consistent with explant damage.Testing was completed to assess lead electrical performance.Measurements throughout this test was within normal limits.Visual examination of the lead noted calcification on the outer insulation, shocking coils and helix.Investigation of the available information/data determined that the observed gradual rise in low voltage shock impedance (lvsi) measurements was associated with calcification, as there was no conclusive evidence of compromised electrical integrity of the lead.This condition may develop over time and can be reflected in a gradual and sustained increase in shock impedance measurements.Boston scientific issued a field safety notice to physicians in july 2025 regarding the potential for reliance defibrillation leads with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (eptfe) coating to exhibit a pattern of gradually increasing lvsi measurements due to calcification, which may result in elevated high voltage shock impedance (hvsi) measurements and reduced shock efficacy.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of shock impedance high out of range was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that upon review of boston scientific latitude remote monitoring system stored data, we identified evidence that this lead exhibited high shock impedance measurements of greater than 125 ohms.No adverse patient effects have been reported.Additional information was received that this right ventricular (rv) lead was explanted and replaced with a new rv lead.A return request is being sent.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDOTAK RELIANCE SG
Common Device Name
IMPLANTABLE LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
road 698, lot no. 12
dorado PR 00646 -260
*   00646-2602
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key22668162
Report Number2124215-2025-52327
Device Sequence Number7533629
Product Code LWS
UDI-Device Identifier00802526531156
UDI-Public(01)00802526531156(17)160218
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter StateMA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P910073
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2014
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Remedial Action Recall,Notification
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/31/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/18/2016
Device Model Number0181
Device Catalogue Number0181
Device Lot Number325847
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/10/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/15/2025
01/27/2026
03/24/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/30/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/20/2025
02/20/2026
03/31/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/18/2014
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age43 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-