• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG PROTEGO SD 65/18; ICD LEAD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG PROTEGO SD 65/18; ICD LEAD Back to Search Results
Model Number 399410
Medical Device Problem Codes Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Ambient Noise Problem (2877)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Shock from Patient Lead(s) (3162)
Date of Event 07/15/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Combination product: yes.
 
Event or Problem Description
This lead was explanted due to noise, causing inappropriate shocks.Should additional information become available, this file will be updated.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Combination product: yes.The device is currently not available for analysis.No conclusion can be drawn based on available information at the moment.The file is closed.The investigation will be re-opened should additional data become available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Combination product: yes.Upon receipt, the lead under complaint was found cut 20.5 cm distal to the df4 connector pin into two fragments.An extraction aid was found on the distal fragment, it is reasonable to assume that the lead was cut during the surgery.The insulation was found rubbed through in the distal end region.Furthermore, the conductor cable was found fractured 8.5 cm proximal to the lead tip.These damages are assumed to be the root cause of the reported oversensing leading to inappropriate shocks delivery.Based on the characteristics of these damages, it is reasonable to assume that the lead had been subject to severe mechanical stress in the implanted state.Significant lead motion in the area of the tricuspid valve and interaction with atypical tissues should be taken into consideration.Furthermore, the shock coils were found deformed, which probably occurred during the extraction procedure due to tensile stress.Prior to the analysis of the device, the quality documents accompanying the manufacturing process for this device were re-investigated.All production steps were performed accordingly, and in particular the final acceptance test proved the device functions to be as specified.In conclusion, the analysis did not reveal any sign of a material or manufacturing problem.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTEGO SD 65/18
Common Device Name
ICD LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin 12359
Manufacturer Contact
6024 jean road
lake oswego, OR 97035
8772459800
MDR Report Key22669289
Report Number1028232-2025-03588
Device Sequence Number19789594
Product Code NVY
UDI-Device Identifier04035479136116
UDI-Public(01)04035479136116(17)160930
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980023
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2015
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/08/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Expiration Date09/30/2016
Device Model Number399410
Device Catalogue Number399410
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/15/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/05/2025
12/08/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/30/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/05/2025
12/08/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/15/2013
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization;
Patient Age73 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-