| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Remove (1528); Defective Component (2292)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/25/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported, after insertion of the bd io needle, the paramedic could not separate the bd io needle hub from the bd io drill.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.Each event reported to bd is evaluated and investigated in accordance with our complaint investigation procedures.The investigation process includes, but is not limited to, evaluation of the event details provided by the complaint facility, a review of complaint history, manufacturing records and risk document where applicable, and an evaluation of the subject device when available to identify potential contributing factors.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information received on 8/18/2025: after proper insertion of the bd io 25 mm needle into the humerus head, the stylet hub remained as the drill separated from the hub connection.The paramedic tried to pull on the upper portion of the stylet by hand, it would not pull up.The ambulance paramedic was able to establish a second io with the ez-io in the other arm.The delay was minimal in terms of outcome.Patient was in extremis and would have bad outcomes, as not being a factor in the overall condition.Cause of death could not be provided for patient.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|