|
It was reported that postoperatively, a fracture occurred post revision surgery, this was believed to be caused due to the high bmi.Fracture occurred in the femur above the stem, this is believed to have occurred after the torniquet was removed and the leg moved post op.The patient was transferred to have plating completed to repair this.
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: according to the information received, ¿additional case in regards to (b)(4) to capture the event - a fracture occurred post revision surgery, this was believed to be caused due to the high bmi (this was over 45 in [year] and we were informed it was similar currently).Fracture occurred in the femur above the stem (which couldn't be seen in the x-ray taken), this is believed to have occurred after the tourniquet was removed and the leg moved post op.Revision of lcs implants which were implanted on [date].Revision due to stiffness, particularly going up and down stairs which was developed postoperatively.This wasn't an issue initially pots op but developed over time.In [year] she had debridement and contracture release which increased flexion to 85 degrees but it then stiffened up again to only about 45 degrees of flexion.This was her right knee, no issues with the left knee which notes mentioned had also had a tka.No pain in left or right knee.Sizes in situ from lcs were 2.5 tibia, 10mm insert and standard femur.Initial notes post op from [year] were stable and well-balanced knee but lateral retinacular structures were tight.No wear was observed on the insert.A fracture occurred post revision surgery, this was believed to be caused due to the high bmi (this was over 45 in [year] and we were informed it was similar currently).Fracture occurred in the femur above the stem (which couldn't be seen in the x-ray taken), this is believed to have occurred after the tourniquet was removed and the leg moved post op.The product was not returned to medtech orthopaedics, however photos were provided for review.The investigation was not able to confirm the reported event as the complaint condition was not represented clearly in the provided photo.Therefore, the investigation could not draw any conclusions about the reported event due to the insufficient evidence provided.Since the device was not returned, a dimensional inspection cannot be performed.The overall complaint was not confirmed as the photographs provided are not representative of the reported complaint condition.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.H11 additional narrative: added: d10 (concomitant).
|