| Catalog Number |
110040000 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Foreign Body Reaction (1868)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Global anatomic implanted on [date] onto [patient] by [surgeon].Head dislodged from proximal body whilst patient was in bed.Global unite anatomic anchor peg glenoid, global unite head, and global unite anatomic proximal body removed.Replaced with delta x-tend reverse implants.Significant metallosis in patient and implants will be cleaned by the hospital to be sent for investigation.Patient status/ outcome / consequences: yes, patient consequence description/was there a clinical outcome experienced by the patient (infection, inflammation, etc.)? metallosis, was other medical intervention (e.G.X-rays, additional procedures, prescriptions, otc, revision) required: unknown, is the patient part of a clinical study: no, (b)(6).Device property of: none, device in possession of: none, (b)(6).Device property of: none, device in possession of: none, (b)(6).Device property of: none, device in possession of: none by checking this box i certify that all information that are known/available has been disclosed.If any new information will be made available, the additional information will be submitted through cst.True.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Additional narrative: if information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #(b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: added: d9.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #: (b)(4).Investigation summary: global anatomic implanted on [date] onto [patient] by [surgeon].Head dislodged from proximal body whilst patient was in bed.Global unite anatomic anchor peg glenoid, global unite head, and global unite anatomic proximal body removed.Replaced with delta x-tend reverse implants.The product was returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics for evaluation.Visual analysis of the returned device found that the glbl unite ant body 135 sz 12 presents signs of what appears to be bone ingrowth adhered to the fixation surface.Based on the observed condition of the glenoid, it is reasonable to conclude that a disassociation event occurred between the head and the proximal body.With the information provided is not possible to determine a potential cause at this moment.The mode of failure of the device is multi-factorial and consideration must be given to all other potential influences such as surgical process, patient variables (e.G.Activity level and use), anatomical considerations and patient changes over time.Any conclusions from the investigational input provided have to be placed into context with all other relevant factors.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device product description: glbl unite ant body 135 sz 12 product code: 110040000 lot number: 8532976 and one non-conformance was identified, however not related to the reported failure mode of the complaint.A functional test was not performed since it was not applicable to the complaint condition.A dimensional inspection was not performed since it was not applicable to the complaint condition.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the glbl unite ant body 135 sz 12 would have contributed to the complained issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities device history lot: a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device product description: glbl unite ant body 135 sz 12 product code: 110040000 lot number: 8532976 and one non-conformance was identified, however not related to the reported failure mode of the complaint.Device history review: a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device product description: glbl unite ant body 135 sz 12 product code: 110040000 lot number: 8532976 and one non-conformance was identified, however not related to the reported failure mode of the complaint.H11 additional narrative: added: d10.Corrected: h3.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary- global anatomic implanted on [date] onto [patient] by [surgeon].Head dislodged from proximal body whilst patient was in bed.Global unite anatomic anchor peg glenoid, global unite head, and global unite anatomic proximal body removed.Replaced with delta x-tend reverse implants.¿the product was not returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics, however photos were provided for review.See attachment image (7).Jpg, image (8).Jpg, image (10).Jpg, image (11).Jpg and image (12).Jpg.The photo investigation revealed that the glbl unite ant body 135 sz 12 was covered with blood and tissue remnants, the proximal body and the humeral head were disengaged, the insertion hole of the humeral head presents what appears to be a plug of tissue, which indicates that the implants could have been detached for a long period of time before surgery, confirming the reported disassociation.With the information provided is not possible to determine a potential cause at this moment.The mode of failure of the device is multi-factorial and consideration must be given to all other potential influences such as surgical process, patient variables (e.G.Activity level and use), anatomical considerations and patient changes over time.Any conclusions from the investigational input provided have to be placed into context with all other relevant factors.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device product description: glbl unite ant body 135 sz 12 product code: 110040000 lot number: 8532976 and one non-conformance was identified, however not related to the reported failure mode of the complaint.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed, and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the glbl unite ant body 135 sz 12 would have contributed to the complained issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities device history lot- a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device product description: glbl unite ant body 135 sz 12 product code: 110040000 lot number: 8532976 and one non-conformance was identified, however not related to the reported failure mode of the complaint.Device history review- a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device product description: glbl unite ant body 135 sz 12 product code: 110040000 lot number: 8532976 and one non-conformance was identified, however not related to the reported failure mode of the complaint.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: global anatomic implanted on [date] onto [patient] by [surgeon].Head dislodged from proximal body whilst patient was in bed.Global unite anatomic anchor peg glenoid, global unite head, and global unite anatomic proximal body removed.Replaced with delta x-tend reverse implants.The product was not returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics, however photos were provided for review.The photo investigation revealed that the glbl unite ant body 135 sz 12 was covered with blood and tissue remnants, the proximal body and the humeral head were disengaged, the insertion hole of the humeral head presents what appears to be a plug of tissue, which indicates that the implants could have been detached for a long period of time before surgery, additionally chronologically x-rays were provided which revealed that a disassociation event occurred between the head and the proximal body.With the information provided is not possible to determine a potential cause at this moment.The mode of failure of the device is multi-factorial and consideration must be given to all other potential influences such as surgical process, patient variables (e.G.Activity level and use), anatomical considerations and patient changes over time.Any conclusions from the investigational input provided have to be placed into context with all other relevant factors.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device product description: glbl unite ant body 135 sz 12 product code: 110040000 lot number: 8532976 and one non-conformance was identified, however not related to the reported failure mode of the complaint.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed, and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the glbl unite ant body 135 sz 12 would have contributed to the complained issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities device history lot: a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device product description: glbl unite ant body 135 sz 12 product code: 110040000 lot number: 8532976 and one non-conformance was identified, however not related to the reported failure mode of the complaint.Device history review: a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device product description: glbl unite ant body 135 sz 12 product code: 110040000 lot number: 8532976 and one non-conformance was identified, however not related to the reported failure mode of the complaint.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|