|
A physician reported that, during calibration the haptics were in the wrong position and torn, so the surgeon was unable to use the lens and it was discarded.Additional information has been requested.There are two medical reports associated with same event.This file is 2 of 2.
|
|
Additional information was provided in d.9., h.3., h.6.And h.11.The lens was returned positioned incorrectly in a transport lens case inside the preloaded sample carton.Only the lens was returned.Viscoelastic was dried on the lens.One haptic was bent in the gusset area.The lens was cleaned with klrp to remove the dried viscoelastic and further evaluate.One haptic has two small, cracked areas on the posterior surface of the haptic/optic junction at the edge.The anterior optic surface has a small, cracked area located near the damaged haptic at the optic edge.Another area of two cracks were observed on the anterior optic surface near the optic edge.A device history record review and a non-conformance-based review of the lot was performed and did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint.All corresponding production release specifications defined in the device master record were met.Viscoelastic information was not provided.It is unknown if a qualified viscoelastic was used.The root cause cannot be determined for the reported complaint.The reported haptic torn damage was not observed; however, one haptic has cracked damage near the edge which was most likely interpreted as the reported complaint.Additional optic damage was observed.The position of the haptics during advancement cannot be determined.The plunger position in relation to the haptic during advancement cannot be determined.Only the lens was returned.The ifu instructs: after the lens has been advanced to the ¿fill-to¿ line, the lens should be visually inspected to determine the position of the haptics.The plunger should be in contact with the trailing optic edge.No part of the lens should exit the nozzle prior to insertion through the incision.Once the lens is in position at the ¿fill-to¿ line, it should be implanted within 3 minutes.Proceeding with implantation of a misfolded haptic or a lens that appears to be ¿out of position¿ can result in a broken haptic or other negative outcome, since the haptic may be trapped and stretched, and/or pinched and sheared by the moving plunger.It is unknown if the qualified viscoelastic was used.The ifu instructs: during device preparation and implantation of the company preloaded delivery system, an company qualified ophthalmic viscoelastic device (ovd) should be used.The use of an unqualified ovd may cause damage to the lens and potential complications during the device preparation and implantation steps.Broken haptics may occur due to the use of a non-qualified viscoelastic.The use of an unqualified ovd may cause damage to the lens and potential complications during the device preparation and implantation steps.If the operating room temperature is too high (greater than 23 degree c / 73 degree f) lens folding consistency is negatively affected, the lens is more adherent and this may inhibit lens advancement.In addition, haptic strength (modulus) decreases as the temperature increases and is more likely to break under stress.If the device is overfilled with ovd as this can prevent the trailing haptic from being placed properly or move the lens out of position resulting in misfolding.If a straight trailing haptic occurs and it was not properly detected to be out of position.If the plunger is not fully advanced, or if the plunger is allowed to retract, the trailing haptic may not release properly from the device.Any of the above listed causes alone, or in combination, may create the reported event.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).H.10 reflects all related report numbers associated with this product event that have been submitted at this time.
|