|
Manufacturer ref# (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Section h3 - the device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
A healthcare professional reported that during an endovascular embolization, an enterprise2 4.5x28mm vascular reconstruction device (enc452812, 9584139) impeded in the y connector and could not be pushed into the microcatheter.The doctor only retracted the stent alone, but the stent was found detached from the delivery wire in y connector.The doctor removed the y connector and removed the stent and then switched to a new stent to complete the surgery.The microcatheter (mc) was not replaced.There was no patient injury reported.Additional event information received on 31-jul-2025 indicated that they were not able to torque the device.There was no evidence of physical material within the device.The microcatheter used was a prowler select plus 150/5cm microcatheter (606s255x, lot unknown).The microcatheter did not kink/bent.There was no excessive force used with the devices.There was no procedure prolongation/delay due to the event.
|
|
Manufacturer ref# (b)(4).Updated sections on this medwatch: b4, d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6 and h11.Complaint conclusion: a healthcare professional reported that during an endovascular embolization, an enterprise2 4.5x28mm vascular reconstruction device (enc452812, 9584139) was impeded in the y connector and could not be pushed into the microcatheter.The doctor only retracted the stent alone, but the stent was found detached from the delivery wire in y connector.The doctor removed the y connector and removed the stent and then switched to a new stent to complete the surgery.The microcatheter (mc) was not replaced.There was no patient injury reported.Additional event information received on 31-jul-2025 indicated that they were not able to torque the device.There was no evidence of physical material within the device.The microcatheter used was a prowler select plus 150/5cm microcatheter (606s255x, lot unknown).The microcatheter did not kink/bent.There was no excessive force used with the devices.There was no procedure prolongation/delay due to the event.The device was returned to j&j medtech for further evaluation.A non-sterile enterprise2 4.5x28mm vascular reconstruction device was received contained in the decontamination pouch.Upon receiving the device, visual inspection was performed, and as described in the event, the stent was detached from the delivery system.The distal end of the delivery wire was kinked.Microscopic inspection was performed on the stent component.It was observed to be in good condition; there was no structural damage (i.E., no broken struts, no kinks); also, it was noted fully expanded, both ends can be noted as completely flared.The delivery wire was subjected to dimensional analysis and all measurements were found to be within specification, including those specifications that control the attachment and delivery of the stent.Therefore, device failure is not suspected to be a contributing factor.A device history record (dhr) was performed and it indicated this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.The issue reported regarding the stent being impeded could not be evaluated due to the detached condition of the stent.In order to perform a functional test, the stent must be attached to the delivery wire and inside the introduce; however, the damages on the distal end of the delivery wire suggest that excessive force was inadvertently applied during the device advancement which ultimately led to the damages found on the delivery wire and detachment of the stent.Based on this, the customer complaint was confirmed.It is possible that clinical and procedural factors, including device manipulation and operator's technique, may have contributed to the reported failure.At this time, there is no evidence to support that the issue reported in the complaint is a result of a defect inherently related to the device.As part of the j&j medtech quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no capa activity is required.It should be noted that product failure could be caused by multiple factors.The instructions for use (ifu) do contain the following recommendations: do not partially deploy the stent from the introducer.Do not apply undue force if resistance is encountered at any point during stent manipulation.Withdraw the unit and advance a new one.Confirm the tip of the delivery wire is entirely within the introducer.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
|