MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEGADYNE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. MEGASOFT UNIVERSAL; MEGA SOFT UNIVERSAL

Catalog Number	0845
Medical Device Problem Code	Arcing of Electrodes (2289)
Health Effect - Clinical Code	No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event	01/01/2025
Type of Reportable Event	Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 8/5/2025.B3: only event year known: 2025.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.The device history records were reviewed and certed by external manufacturing that the manufacturing criteria were met prior to the release of the equipment.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an unknown procedure there was sparking with their megadyne pad while in use.There were no patient consequences.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent 11/5/2025.Corrected data d4: udi#.Investigation summary: the product was returned for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.The pad and pigtail cable were returned for analysis.Visual analysis of the returned sample determined that the 0845 pad, was returned with a tear on the top surface at the corner overmold.The pad and cable were connected to the generator, and no anomalies were observed.The electrical test was performed, and it met the specifications.No evidence was found of flash fire reported.It is possible that the damage noted on the returned sample could be possibly caused by exposing the pad to other equipment or may be a result of improper handling.As part of ethicon endo surgery quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device sn (b)(6), and no non-conformances were identified.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) date sent: 12/8/2025.Corrected data: h6.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: unfortunately, a long time has passed since the sparking issue happened and i don¿t recall the exact procedure or patient size, but following are the answers as best as i can remember.Where did the sparking occur? was it near the corner or the tear where the flectron is exposed (brown color)? 1- most probably near the wholes on the pad but hard to be exact because the patient is under the drapes.Where was the patient in relation to the sparking? 2- over the top of the pad but hard to tell exactly which wholes on the pad.Where was the active electrode (e.G., pencil) relative to the spark? 3- on top of the drapes.Were there any fluids (e.G., urine, saline, etc.) in the field? 4- generally, it is possible to have a bit of residual sterile prep or urine in between the patient and the pad depending on the procedure or even saline while lavaging but i can't remember the specifics of those multiple times this happened.What cleaner or disinfectant (brand name or active ingredients) was used to clean the pad? 5- alcohol was the pad rinsed with water and allowed to dry before this surgical procedure? 6- no were any liquids used during the prep? 7- no what skin preparation regimen was utilized for the procedure? 8- surgical scrub (4% chlorhexidine solution) followed by alcohol, followed by surgical paint (alcohol & baxedin mixture 40::1 ratio) is it possible for the patient to be in contact with the metal portion of the or table? 9- depending on patient size on rare occasions it is possible.How was the room set up, including patient positioning, and where was the pad in relation to the patient? 10- patient is always positioned on top of the pad.Was there anything between the patient and the pad (e.G., sheet, drape, etc.)? 11- no what generator settings were used (cut, coag, spray, etc., and the corresponding power)? 12- the power settings can range between 45-80 for cutting and 30-50 for coag.This depends on the cautery box used in each or suite.

• Brand Name: MEGASOFT UNIVERSAL
• Common Device Name: MEGA SOFT UNIVERSAL
• Manufacturer (Section D): MEGADYNE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.; 4545 creek road; cincinnati OH 45242
• Manufacturer (Section G): MEGADYNE MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
• Manufacturer Contact: orla o'mahony ; 475 calle c; guaynabo ; 3035526892
• MDR Report Key: 22719521
• Report Number: 1721194-2025-00064
• Device Sequence Number: 21235393
• Product Code: GEI
• UDI-Device Identifier: 10614559103906
• UDI-Public: (01)10614559103906(17)260531
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter Country: CA
• PMA/510(K) Number: K133726
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Serviced by Third Party (Y/N): Unknown
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Foreign,Health Professional
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Other
• Remedial Action: Recall
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 11/05/2025

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: No
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: Yes
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Expiration Date: 05/31/2026
• Device Catalogue Number: 0845
• Device Lot Number: GS24012359
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: Device Returned to Manufacturer
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: No
• Type of Report(Section G): Follow-Up
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 07/24/2025
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 10/20/2025; 11/24/2025
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 08/05/2025
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 11/05/2025; 12/08/2025
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Yes
• Date Device Manufactured: 07/02/2025
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Reuse
• If action reported to FDA under 21 USC 360i(g), list FDA-assigned Recall Number or include a statement: Z-1998-2023; Z-0597-2024
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Patient Sex: Unknown