| Catalog Number |
CF6-8-100 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Overheating of Device (1437); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
07/14/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A physician used a closurefast catheter to treat a patients left great saphenous vein.It was reported that post use of the closurefast catheter, a kink on the coil and bubbling of the fep liner were observed.The lumen was flushed prior to use, tumescent infiltration and hand/manual compression were utilized, and no resistance was encountered during advancement.No vessel tortuosity or calcification were present.Proper temperature was reached.There were no error messages/codes/warnings displayed.It was a very uneventful prep, catheter placement and treatment.No difficulty placing it and no trauma to the catheter.Physician did have to apply additional tumescent at one point in the mid-thigh region.The device was safely removed from the patient.Physician didn¿t notice anything out of the ordinary until the catheter was taken out and noticed the housing of the catheter had melted.One segment was treated, the vein closed, and the procedure was completed using a new medtronic device.No vessel damage reported.No patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Image analysis: four images were received.The images show the a closurefast catheter kinked at the heating coil/ element section of the catheter and bubbling can be observed.The lot# is shown in the images and are consistent with the reported event.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product analysis no ancillary devices were returned with the device.Damage was noted along the heating coil/ element.Microscopic examination also revealed the heating element/coil of the device was not exposed but a kink was observed at the point of bubbling the catheter cable connector was examined: the catheter reference key shows evidence of wear, and the red ink was visible in some areas.All pins were visually inspected to be straight visual inspection of the returned catheter revealed three kinks along the shaft; the kinks were observed at approx.79.4 cm, 89.7 cm 91.2 cm from the distal tip of the device the catheter connector was plugged into the resistance tester to perform continuity/resistance and connected to rfg for functional testing; the catheter was tested according to the test parameters, test methods, and acceptance criteria.Test 1.(e+/ e- test) (specification: 80 ohms to 113 ohms) ¿ result = 90.4 ohms - pass test 2.(tc+/ tc- test) (specification: = 250 ohms) ¿ result = 161.2 ohms -pass test 3.(resistor 1) (specification: 13.43 to 13.97 k ohms) result = 16.09 k ohms)-fail test 4.(resistor 2) (specification: 7.90 k ohms to 8.22 k ohms) result = 8.83 k ohms)- fail test 3 (resistor 1) test 4 (resistor 2) ¿ failed tests 1 2 are within acceptance criteria.The catheter was connected to both the rfg3 and rfg2 lab generator, the device did not complete the required cycle with an error message ¿the connected device is unsupported.Please connect another device¿ being seen on the rfg2 generator ¿the connected device is unsupported.Please connect another device¿ being seen on the rfg3 generator.The device was disconnected and reconnected; however, the same error messages appeared.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|