|
It was reported the or used an open-end flexi-tip ureteral catheter on a patient and mentioned that upon insertion, some of the ureteral catheter shaved off in the patient.They were to retrieve what they could.It is unknown how the pieces were removed or if any were retained.Additional information has been requested regarding the patient and the event.At the time of this report, no further information has been provided.There were no adverse effects to the patient reported.
|
|
Correction: d8, d9, h3 and h6 (annex a).H3 - device available for eval: not returned to the manufacturer.Investigation ¿ evaluation: it was reported the or used an open-end flexi-tip ureteral catheter on a patient and mentioned that upon insertion, some of the ureteral catheter shaved off in the patient.They were to retrieve what they could.It is unknown how the pieces were removed or if any were retained.There were no adverse effects to the patient reported.Reviews of documentation including the complaint history, device history record (dhr), quality control (qc) procedures, and instructions for use (ifu), were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned to cook for evaluation.Therefore, no physical examinations could be conducted.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the device history record (dhr) found no related non-conformances that could have contributed to the reported failure mode.A complaint history database search showed no other related complaint associated with the failure mode for the complaint device lot.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that the device was manufactured to specification and that there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in the field.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The ifu packaged with the device provides the following information related to the reported issue: 'precautions: if you encounter resistance while advancing or withdrawing the catheter, stop.Determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding.' based on the available information, no product returned, and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that the definitive cause of the issue could not be determined.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|