• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number DFW300
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Discomfort (2330)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported by the customer that the surgeon planned to explant the preloaded toric multifocal intraocular lens due to patient dissatisfaction.Additional information provided by the surgeon indicated that the explantation was scheduled, but the patient had called in and canceled it some time ago.Upon further follow-up, it was revealed that the lens was eventually explanted and replaced with another model.The patient was thrilled with the outcome of her treatment and had already locked in the power of the lens, expressing that she was ecstatic about the results.No additional information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a3b, a4 and a5: unknown/information not provided.Section b3: date of event: unknown/information not provided.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: unknown, information not provided.Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product was returned to the manufacturing site for evaluation.Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: mar 8, 2025.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification was performed on the suspect product and found the lens was cut in half with one haptic detached and missing.The lens was cleaned and inspected, and scratches were observed on the lens.No further issues were observed.No further evaluation was performed.No issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issues reported were identified during product evaluation.The other issues observed during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records review for this purchase order shows that the units were released within specification.No process deviations (dev), nonconformances (nc/nr), or capas were found as part of this manufacturing records review.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key22733430
Report Number3012236936-2025-000210
Device Sequence Number20937289
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474752306
UDI-Public(01)05050474752306(17)241101
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateAR
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/21/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/01/2024
Device Model NumberDFW300
Device Catalogue NumberDFW300U130
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/13/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/19/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/06/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/21/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/01/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient RaceWhite
-
-