• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR FOGARTY THRU-LUMEN EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR FOGARTY THRU-LUMEN EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER; CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY Back to Search Results
Model Number 12TLW804F
Medical Device Problem Code Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/14/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
As reported; while testing this fogarty embolectomy catheter, it broke in half.There was no allegation of patient injury.Patient demographics unable to be obtained.The device was available for evaluation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.The product is expected to be returned for analysis; however, it has not yet been received.Upon the return of the product a supplemental report will be sent with the investigation results.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Added information to section h6 (type of investigation) updated section d9, h6 (component code), h6 (investigation findings) and h6 (investigations conclusions).The device was received for evaluation.The report of catheter broken in half was confirmed.Catheter body was broken next to y-adapter.Cross surface of broken section appeared uneven and rough.Broken sections appeared to match up.No other visible damage was observed from catheter body.The manufacturing records were reviewed for the lot involved and there is no indication of a related nonconformance.All process parameters were met and inspections passed successfully.Based on the available information, there is no evidence that supports or confirms the failure mode is associated to a manufacturing or design defect.The manufacturing process has the controls to detect this conditions.Also, as per the ifu "balloon rupture and catheter separation as a result of excessive pull force applied to remove adherent material are the most frequent causes of reported failures." and "to minimize the risk of vessel damage, balloon rupture, or tip detachment, do not exceed the maximum recommended inflation and pull force for each size catheter".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FOGARTY THRU-LUMEN EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER
Common Device Name
CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
samantha eveleigh
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492503939
MDR Report Key22737191
Report Number2015691-2025-06411
Device Sequence Number9240213
Product Code DXE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103043518
UDI-Public(01)00690103043518(17)261114(11)240815(10)65865938
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K240078
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/21/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number12TLW804F
Device Lot Number65865938
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/22/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/20/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date08/07/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/21/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/15/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-