|
There were multiple 510k numbers reported to be involved.The information for the additional 510k is as follows: g4.Pma/510(k)#: k020322, k022129, k023444, k023634, k023858, k024153, k031530, k031699, k031912, k032299, k032567, k032655, k033362, k033458, k033560, k041384, k042932, k052269, k060214, k060217, k060257, k060444, k060447, k061327, k061355, k062207, k062944, k063301, k063486, k063573, k063811, and k06382.H3.A device evaluation is anticipated but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
|
Investigation summary: this complaint is for false positive esbl results when using phoenix panel nmic-311 (catalog number: 449452) batch number: 5127465.Customer returned panels, isolates or phoenix generated lab reports were not available for the investigation.It is to be noted that the nmic-311 does not include cpo detect.To investigate, retention panels of the complaint batch and control panels of the same material but different batch number were inoculated with in house isolate escherichia coli a25922 and placed in a phoenix m50 to observe for esbl flags.All panels returned the isolate with esbl negative results; therefore, this complaint is not confirmed.The batch history record was satisfactory, and no quality notifications were generated during manufacturing and inspection.Complaint trending was performed, and no trends were identified associated with this defect.Bd will continue to monitor for trends and take action as necessary.Please continue to communicate any additional concerns.
|