|
Kenvue is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which kenvue has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, kenvue or its employees, that the report constitutes an admission that the device, kenvue, or its employees, caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.In august 2023 johnson & johnson¿s consumer health business separated from johnson & johnson, and we became an independent public company, kenvue.As part of our ongoing evolution, kenvue updated the name of its us operating company, johnson & johnson consumer inc.(¿jjci¿) to ¿kenvue brands llc¿ on october 28, 2024.Kenvue recently moved to its new corporate headquarters in summit nj.Its previous corporate headquarters was 199 grandview road, skillman, nj 08558.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.A1, a2, a4, a5: patient identifier, patient age, weight, and ethnicity and race were not provided for reporting.Consumer & apos's daughter reported event via social media.D1, d2, d3, d4: this report is for one (1) listerine sensitivity zero alcohol mouthrinse frsh mnt 95ml (b)(4), lot number ¿ ni.D4: udi #: (b)(4) upc # 00312547235952.Lot # ni.Expiration date: ni.D10: device is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.H3, h4, h6: device evaluation/investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn as product was not returned to manufacturer.Device history records review could not be completed without a lot number.H6: health effect clinical code: e040202 refers to consumer alleged about ¿problems (anaphylaxis)/allergic reaction in throat ¿ health effect impact code: f12 refers to serious injury/ illness/ impairment.Health effect impact code: f23 refers to unexpected medical intervention.Case assessed as serious.It was reported that following use of product, consumer had to be ¿needlessly treated for problems (anaphylaxis)¿; it was also reported that ¿a balloon had to be blown up in her esophagus because of the allergic reaction in her throat¿.Based on overall details in limited information available, event interpreted as anaphylaxis (subsumed allergic reaction in throat) which is ime and reported intervention of ¿balloon had to be blown up in her esophagus¿ was considered medically significant and thus case assessed as serious.Consumer stated, & quot; you must delete all artificial colors from your products the same as the food manufacturers.& quot; upon review of product details, the product does not contain dyes.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|