|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, age, gender, weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.Section d.2b: procode is krd/hcg.Based on complaint information, the device is not available to be returned for analysis.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (31555207) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no internal actions related to device manufacture or inspection.Product analysis cannot be conducted as the product was not returned for analysis.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.With the limited information available and without the product available for analysis, the reported issue documented in the complaint could not be confirmed.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.The exact cause of the event could not be conclusively determined; however, it is possible that circumstances of the procedure and / or device manipulation / interaction may have contributed to the reported failure.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered later.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by johnson & johnson medtech, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, johnson & johnson medtech, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
|
The healthcare professional reported on 07-aug-2025, during an endovascular coil embolization of a left parietal branch of the middle meningeal artery (mma), the physician inserted the 1mm x 4cm cerepak freeform mini (mcr091040 / 31555207) as coil number 5 (mix of optiblock coils (balt) and freeform minis preceded) through a plato¿ microcatheter (scientia vascular).The physician went to detach the coil using a mechanical detachment handle (mdh1 / lot# unknown).As the physician pulled the coil pusher wire back, the coil started to come with the pusher wire, and it detached in the microcatheter.The physician was able to advance the coil back out into the vessel.The physician then inserted an aristotle® 14 guidewire (scientia vascular) to push the coil into the coil back, as he was pulling the wire out, the 1mm x 4cm cerepak freeform mini coil stretched onto the wire.The physician pulled out the plato microcatheter, the aristotle guidewire, and the 1mm x 4cm cerepak freeform mini coil and removed them all from the patient.The physician was able to re-access the parietal branch using a new plato microcatheter and continued with the coil embolization.There was no procedure delay due to the reported issue; the procedure was successfully completed without any negative impact on the patient.On 08-aug-2025, additional information was received.Per the information, the physician removed the 1mm x 4cm cerepak freeform mini and replaced it with a 1mm x 6cm optiblock coil.There was no blood flow interruption due to the reported issue.Coil entanglement with previously placed coils was not suspected as a cause for the stretching of the 1mm x 4cm cerepak freeform mini.Continuous flush was maintained through the microcatheter during the procedure.
|