|
|
| Catalog Number |
71634000 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
| Date of Event |
07/19/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during an orif surgery, one (1) nail cap {} 0mm was inserted at the correct angle, but it did not fully engage and backed out.After several attempts at different angles and with increased force, the edge of the nail cap {} 0mm, where it attaches to the key, broke making its removal impossible.The procedure was resumed without delay using the same device, and no injuries were reported as a result.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).This complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication related to a product problem with a smith+nephew device.The reported issue(s) relate to known inherent device and/or procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for evaluation.However, the photographs were reviewed and revealed that the device is fractured.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that the adverse event was likely caused partially or wholly by the user of the product.The insertion of the nail cap at different angles and increased force was likely the clinical root cause of the nail cap breakage.The patient impact is determined to be the broken nail cap.The nail cap is an optional component.It is made of titanium alloy and intended for implantation.The cap was reported to be stuck in the nail, so although unlikely, movement of the cap cannot be ruled out as a potential factor.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history revealed similar events for the listed part number over the previous 12 months, but no similar events for the batch based on the historical data, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.According with inspection drawing, the final inspection includes the verification of part configuration per print.Also, per material specification, the quality and manufacture of standard grade titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium alloy shall be controlled.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|