| Model Number |
ONYXNG27512UX |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Damaged by Another Device (2915); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Material Deformation (2976); Positioning Problem (3009)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
08/01/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a procedure two onyx frontier coronary drug eluting stents dislodged during removal following a failed delivery.The lesion being treated with the 2.75 x 26mm onyx frontier stent was a non tortuous lesion with 95% stenosis in the proximal circumflex (lcx) artery.The lesion being treated with the 2.75 x 12 mm onyx frontier stent had 50% stenosis and was located in the ostium/proximal obtuse marginal (om).Both devices were inspected prior to use with no issues noted.Negative prep was performed on the 2.75 x 26mm onyx frontier stent with no issues noted.Negative prep was not performed on the 2.75x12mm onyx frontier stent.Both lesions were pre-dilated.Both devices passed though previously deployed stents.Resistance was encountered when advancing both devices.Pre-stent angioplasty was performed in the lcx using a non-complaint non-medtronic 2.75 x 12mm percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (ptca) balloon at 14atm.The 2.75 x 26mm onyx frontier stent was successfully implanted in the lcx using a jailed balloon technique to the first obtuse marginal artery (om1) patency as side branch.A 2.5 x 20mm ptca balloon was used in the om1 and was inflated to a low pressure of 2atm post stent deployment in the main branch.The balloon was retrieved and the stent in the main branch was expanded using the same stent balloon inflated to 18atm.Repeat angiographic images revealed a patent om1 with timi iii flow.The om1 was then recrossed via the stent struts of the lcx stent and a non-medtronic 2.25 x 12mm ptca was inflated to 15atm at the vessel ostium.It was then attempted to deliver the 2.75 x 12mm onyx frontier stent to be deployed as a t and small protrusion (tap) stenting technique.The 2.75x12mm onyx frontier was unable to be delivered to the lesion site and became dislodged from the delivery balloon and fluoroscopy revealed that it was in the proximal lcx and partially into the distal left main.A microsnare was loaded on the guidewire and the undeployed stent in the proximal lcx was captured and removed.The stent remained entangled to the stent already deployed in the lcx which resulted in both stents being removed through the guide catheter.Repeat angiographic images showed no vessel dissection and timi iii flow in the lcx and om1.A new onyx frontier 2.75 x 26 mm stent was deployed in the lcx and the jailed om1 exhibited timi iii flow post stent deployment.The intervention was successful.No further patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product analysis: two dislodged and deformed stents were returned for evaluation loaded on a wire.The two stents are entangled in each other.The distal end of a snare device was also returned.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|