|
ARTHROCARE CORPORATION COBLATION HALO WAND; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
72290134 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Intermittent Energy Output (4025)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Hematoma (1884)
|
| Date of Event |
07/17/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal reference number: (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication related to a product problem with a smith+nephew device.The reported issue(s) relate to known inherent device and/or procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during an ent procedure, the coblation halo wand presented intermittent incisions.The electrode was not performing ablation.The device was disconnected and reconnected, but the problem continued, and the specialist applied slightly more force.Surgery was completed with a back-up device, instead.At the end of the procedure, there was a hematoma in the right cavity, which was the first tonsil removed with the faulty device, and a hole that required two stitches.There was no surgical delay, and no further complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection revealed no manufacturing abnormalities.Product was out of the original packaging.No packaging returned.The tip had signs of use.A functional evaluation was performed on the returned device and found no issues producing plasma or activating coag.The output had no issues with being steady while in use.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.The instructions for use were reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The root cause could not be determined since the reported malfunction could not be duplicated during the investigation.Please refer to the instructions for use for precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|