|
|
| Catalog Number |
VCP772D |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/26/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained via: - please provide the lot number.=>unk - please perform and document the follow up attempt for product return.Please document the shipment tracking number in notes or rmao sections.=>the device has been received at sukagawa and will be shipped.Please check rmao.Tracking number: (b)(4) - provide the source or name and title of external person providing answers to follow-up (external person submitting answers to sales rep or loc/bq).=>kana takahashi the manufacturing records could not be reviewed as the batch/lot number is unknown.H3 investigation summary: the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.Two paper lids that pertains to product code vcp772d were received for analysis.Upon visual assesment of the returned samples, the sutures and needles were not returned, the event described could not be confirmed.If additional information becomes available, the investigation will be updated accordingly.No conclusion could be reached on the cause of the reported event.As part of the ethicon quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.D4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a neurosurgery procedure on (b)(6) 2025 and suture was used.During the procedure, it was reported by a sales rep that, during an unknown neurosurgery, the suture was broken when the needle holder was held about 1/3 of the way from the caudal side during use.It was a control release needle.Another product was used to complete the case.When we send the sample to you, we will let you know its return date and tracking number.Further details are not provided from the hp.No adverse patient consequences were reported.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Corrected information: d4, e1.Additional information: d9, h3, h6.H3 investigation summary: a failed suture needle, labeled as (b)(4), was submitted to herrera, stafford and associates, llc (hsa) for fractographic evaluation.The component was identified as product code vcp772d.It was requested that hsa assess the fracture mode of the failure.The product received for analysis was vcp772d.Visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.A fracture was observed at the suture attachment.The needle was received in two pieces, only one of the mating fracture surfaces was examined for this evaluation.A scanning electron microscope (sem) was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations in order to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation of pc-001919524 revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile overload failure.This was a ductile fracture.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|