|
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US PFC*SIGMA/OV/DOME PAT 3PEG,38; SIGMA KNEE PRIMARY : KNEE PATELLA
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
960102 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Unspecified Infection (1930); Osteolysis (2377); Joint Laxity (4526)
|
| Date of Event |
06/17/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the patient underwent the revision of pfc due to lysis and instability.When the knee was opened, the polyethylene had some unnatural wear and signs of lysis.Cr femur, polyethylene and fb base were removed.Minimal bone loss on tibial side.Some bone lose on femoral side which bone graft was used to correct.Pt had minimal signs of infection so proceeded to implant attune revision.Good stability attained with stems and sleeves both sides.The procedure was successfully completed with no surgical delay.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: evision of pfc due to lysis and instability.Original surgeon was [removed].When the knee open the polyethylene had some unnatural wear and signs of lysis.Cr femur, polyethylene and fb base were removed.Minimal bone loss on tibial side.Some bone lose on femoral side which bone graph was used to correct.Pt had minimal signs of infection so proceeded to implant attune revision.Good stability attained with stems and sleeves both sides.The product was not returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics; however, photos were provided for review.The photographs attached were reviewed, however they do not represent the reported pfc*sigma/ov/dome pat 3peg,38.Therefore, the investigation could not draw any conclusions about the reported event due to the insufficient evidence provided.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed, and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.The overall complaint was not confirmed as the photographs provided are not representative of the reported pfc*sigma/ov/dome pat 3peg,38.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.H11 additional narrative: added: d10 and h4.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|